ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á¦ 1õÃß ¼±ÅÃÀû ½Å°æ±Ù Â÷´Ü¼úÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º
The Efficacy of Ultrasonography-guided S1 Selective Nerve Root Block
´ëÇÑÁ¤Çü¿Ü°úÃÊÀ½ÆÄÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 7±Ç 2È£ p.113 ~ p.119
Àü¿µ´ë(Jeon Young-Dae) - °í½Å´ëÇб³ º¹À½º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èűÕ(Kim Tae-Kyun) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
½É´ë¹«(Shim Dae-Moo) - ¿ø±¤´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èâ¼ö(Kim Chang-Su) - °í½Å´ëÇб³ º¹À½º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Abstract
¸ñÀû: Á¦ 1õÃß ½Å°æ±Ù Áõ»óÀ» È£¼ÒÇÏ´Â Ãß°£ÆÇ Å»ÃâÁõ ȯÀÚ ¹× ôÃß ÇùÂøÁõ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼±ÅÃÀû ½Å°æ±Ù Â÷ ´Ü¼úÀ» ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© °í½ÄÀûÀÎ ¹æ»ç¼± ¿µ»ó ÁõÆø±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¹æ¹ý°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ±× °á°ú ¹× Á¤È®¼º¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 2012³â 2¿ùºÎÅÍ 2013³â 12¿ù±îÁö ¿äÃß Ãß°£ÆÇ Å»ÃâÁõÀ̳ª ôÃß ÇùÂøÁõÀ¸·Î ¹ß»ýÇÑ ÇÏÁö ¹æ»çÅëÀ» ÁÖ¼Ò·Î ³»¿øÇÑ È¯ÀÚ Áß Á¦1 õÃß ½Å°æ±Ù Â÷´Ü¼úÀ» ½Ã¼ú ¹ÞÀº 38¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇà ÇÑ 18¸í(A±º)°ú ¹æ»ç¼± ¿µ»ó ÁõÆø±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ 20¸í(B±º)À» 1°³¿ù Ã߽à °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù. È¿°ú ÆÇÁ¤Àº ÅëÁõÀÇ º¯È¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ ±â À§ÇÑ µµ±¸·Î ½Ã°¢ÅëÁõôµµ(VAS, Visual Analogue Scale)¿Í ±â´ÉÀ» Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÑ µµ±¸·Î ¿äÅë ±â´ÉÀå¾Öôµµ(KMODI, Korean Modified Oswestry Disability Index)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢ ½Ã¼ú ¼Ò¿ä ½Ã°£À» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: VAS Á¡¼ö´Â A±º¿¡¼ ½Ã¼ú Àü 7.40¡¾}0.85, ½Ã¼ú 1°³¿ù ÈÄ 4.7¡¾}1.43·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, B±º¿¡¼ ½Ã¼ú Àü 7.39¡¾}1.02, ½Ã¼ú 1°³¿ù ÈÄ 4.36¡¾}1.64·Î µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÑ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¼Ò¿ä ½Ã°£Àº A±ºÀÌ 477.53¡¾}115.02ÃÊ, B±ºÀÌ 492.47 ¡¾}144.38ÃÊ·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. K-MODI´Â A±º¿¡¼ ½Ã¼ú Àü 72.8¡¾}12.3¿¡¼ ½Ã¼ú 1°³¿ù ÈÄ 43.3¡¾}10.3 ·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ°í, B±º¿¡¼ ½Ã¼ú Àü 73.8¡¾}11.5¿¡¼ ½Ã¼ú 1°³¿ù ÈÄ 44.1¡¾}11.2·Î µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ À¯ÀÇÇÑ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ±×·¯³ª µÎ ±º »çÀÌ¿¡¼ VAS Á¡¼ö ¹× K-MODI ºñ±³´Â À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
°á·Ð: ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Á¦ 1õÃß ½Å°æ±Ù Â÷´Ü¼úÀº ¹æ»ç¼± ¿µ»ó ÁõÆø±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °í½ÄÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ºñÇØ ÀÓ»ó °á°ú ¹× ¼Ò ¿ä ½Ã°£¿¡ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾øÀ¸³ª, ¿Ü·¡¿¡¼ °£´ÜÈ÷ ½Ã¼ú ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀåÁ¡ÀÌ ÀÖ¾î Ãß°£ÆÇ Å»ÃâÁõÀ̳ª ôÃß ÇùÂøÁõ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ À¯¿ë ÇÑ ½Ã¼ú ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
Purpose: This study was to evaluate effect and efficiency of S1 selective nerve root block using ultrasonographyguided compared with fluoroscopy-guided for lumbar disc herniation or spinal stenosis patients.
Materials and Methods: Between February 2012 and December 2013, 38 patients who were with lower leg radiating pain for more than 1months and underwent S1 selective spinal nerve root block in our institution, were reviewed. They divided into two groups: Group A included 18 patients with ultrasonography-guided and Group B included 20 patients with fluoroscopy-guided. Treatment effectiveness was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Korea Modified Oswestry Disability Index (K-MODI). They were evaluated its preoperatively, postoperatively and 1 month later. We were recorded whole procedure time.
Results: VAS was improved from 7.4 to 4.7 at 1 month in group A and from 7.39 to 4.36 at 1month in group B. KMODI was improved from 72.8 to 43.3 at 1month in group A and from 73.8 to 44.1 at 1month in group B. Whole procedure time were 477.53¡¾}115.02s, 492.47¡¾}144.38s in group A, group B, respectively. But there was no significant difference in VAS and K-MODI between two groups.
Conclusion: Ultrasonography-guided sacral nerve root block is effective and accurate method in sacral radiating pain.
Ű¿öµå
S1 nerve root, Spinal stenosis, Lumbar disc herniation, Selective nerve root block, Ultrasonogram
KMID :
1195520140070020113
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)