ÁßÇб³ ¾ß±¸¼±¼ö¿¡¼ ½ÃÇàÇÑ ÁÖ°üÀý ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»çÀÇ °á°ú
The Results of Ultrasound Examination of the Elbow in Middle School Baseball Players
´ëÇÑÁ¤Çü¿Ü°úÃÊÀ½ÆÄÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 7±Ç 2È£ p.89 ~ p.97
ȲÅÂÇõ(Hwang Tae-Hyok) - ÁÁÀº»ï¼±º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú
Á¶Çü·¡(Cho Hyung-Rae) - (ÁÖ)±Û·çÄ
¿ÕÅÂÇö(Wang Tae-Hyun) - ÁÁÀº»ï¼±º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú
ÁøÈ«±â(Jin Hong-Ki) - ÁÁÀº»ï¼±º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°ú
Abstract
¸ñÀû: ÁßÇб³ ¾ß±¸ ¼±¼öÀÇ ´Üü °ËÁø¿¡¼ È®ÀÎµÈ ÁÖ°üÀý ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»çÀÇ ÀÌ»ó ¼Ò°ß¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 4°³ÀÇ ÁßÇб³ ¾ß±¸ºÎ¸¦ ¹æ¹®ÇÏ¿© ÁÖ°üÀý ÅëÁõ À¯¹«¿¡ »ó°ü¾øÀÌ ÃÑ 93¸íÀÇ ¼±¼ö(³ªÀÌ: 12~15¼¼, Æò±Õ: 13.5¼¼)¿¡°Ô ¾çÃø ÁÖ°üÀý ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç´Â ¾çÃø ÁÖ°üÀýÀÇ ³»Ãø°ú Àü¿ÜÃøÀ» °Ë»çÇÏ¿© °¢°¢ ³»»ó °ú °ñ´ÜÀÇ ºÐ¸®³ª ºÐÀý, ¼ÒµÎ ¹Ú¸®¼º °ñ¿¬°ñ¿°ÀÇ À¯¹«¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÁÖ°üÀý ÅëÁõ À¯¹«, ÀÌÇÐÀû °Ë»ç ¼Ò°ß°ú ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ÀÌ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀÇ °ü°è ¹× Åõ¼ö¿Í ÀÏ¹Ý ¾ß¼öµéÀÇ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ¼Ò°ßÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù.
°á°ú: ÃÑ 93¸íÀÇ ¼±¼ö Áß 36¸í(39%)¿¡¼ ¿ì¼¼¼öÀÇ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ÀÌ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç ³»»ó°ú °ñ´Ü ºÐ¸® ¶Ç´Â ºÐÀýÀÌ 30¸í, ÁֵΠ¹Ú¸®¼º °ñ¿¬°ñ¿°Àº 2¸í, µÎ º´º¯ ¸ðµÎ°¡ µ¿¹ÝµÈ °æ¿ì°¡ 4¸í À̾ú´Ù. ÁÖ°üÀý ÅëÁõÀÌ ÀÖ´Â 37¸í Áß 29¸í (78%)¿¡¼ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ÀÌ»ó ¼Ò°ßÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌÇÐÀû °Ë»ç »ó ³»»ó°ú °ñ´Ü ÀÌ»óÀº ³»ÃøºÎ ¾ÐÅë(59%), ¿Ü¹Ý ºÎÇϰ˻ç (52%)¿¡¼ ¾ç¼ºÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç ¹Ú¸®¼º °ñ¿¬°ñ¿°À» º¸ÀÌ´Â 6¸í Áß 5¸í(83%)¿¡¼ 5¢ªÀÌ»óÀÇ ÁÖ°üÀý ±¼°î ±¸ÃàÀÌ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ³» »ó°ú °ñ´Ü ÀÌ»óÀº Åõ¼ö¿Í ¾ß¼ö¿¡¼ Áø´Ü ºóµµÀÇ ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾úÀ¸³ª ¹Ú¸®¼º °ñ¿¬°ñ¿°Àº Åõ¼ö¿¡ ¸¹¾Ò´Ù(p<0.05).
°á·Ð: ÁÖ°üÀý ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç´Â ÇöÀå¿¡¼ ½ÃÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â À¯¿ëÇÑ ¼±º° °Ë»çÀ̸ç û¼Ò³â ¾ß±¸ ÁÖ°üÀý ÅëÁõÀÇ ÁÖ ¿øÀÎÀÌ µÇ´Â ÁÖ°üÀý ³»»ó°ú °ñ´ÜÀÇ ÀÌ»óÀ̳ª ¹Ú¸®¼º °ñ¿¬°ñ¿°À» Á¶±â ¹ß°ßÇϴµ¥ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
Purpose: To evaluate the ultrasonographic findings of the elbows on group screening of middle school baseball players.
Materials and Methods: Ninety-three players (age: 12-15, mean 13.5 years) of four middle school baseball team were evaluated with bilateral elbow ultrasonographies in the field regardless of elbow pain. Medial and anterolateral ultrasound examination of the both elbow were performed in the field to detect any abnormalities including medial epicondylar separation or fragmentation and capitellar osteochondritis dissecans respectively. We analyzed the relationship among elbow pain, physical findings and sonographic abnormalities and the differences of sonographic abnormalities between pitchers and fielders.
Results: Thirty-six of 93 (39%) players had sonographic abnormalities of elbow in dominant arm, 30 with medial epicondylar apophyseal separation or fragmentation, 2 with osteochondritis dissecans, 4 with both lesions. Twenty-nine of 37 (78%) players with elbow pain had sonographic abnormalities. On physical examination, players with medial epicondylar abnormalities had medial epicondylar tenderness (59%) and pain on valgus stress test (52%), and 5 of 6 (83%) players with osteochondritis dissecans showed flexion contracture more than 5¢ª. The incidence of medial epicondylar abnormalities between pitchers and fielders was statistically not significant but osteochondritis dissecans was more prevalent in pitchers (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Elbow sonography is a simple and useful screening tool in the field and also effective for early detection of medial epicondylar abnormalities or osteochondritis dissecans that could be the main causes of elbow pain in adolescent baseball players.
Ű¿öµå
Little leaguer¡¯s elbow, Ultrasonography, Medial epicondylar separation, Medial epicondylar fragmentation, Osteochondritis dissecans
KMID :
1195520140070020089
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)