´Ü¼ø ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼®È¸¼º °Ç¿°¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ¼º»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¹ÃøÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ°¡?
Is it Possible to predict the Characteristics of Calcific Deposition in Calcific Tendinitis of Shoulder Joint?

´ëÇÑÁ¤Çü¿Ü°úÃÊÀ½ÆÄÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 7±Ç 2È£ p.77 ~ p.83

±è¼ºÀç(Kim Sung-Jae) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÈñÁ¦(Lee Hee-Jae) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
À̱¤Çö(Lee Kwang-Hyun) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
¹Úµ¿Çõ(Park Dong-Hyuck) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
À̺À±Ù(Lee Bong-Gun) - ÇѾç´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº °ß°üÀýÀÇ ¼®È¸¼º °Ç¿°¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ¼º»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ´Ü¼ø ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ºÐ·ù¹ý µéÀÌ °¡Áö´Â Áø´ÜÀû Á¤¹Ðµµ(precision)¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡·Î½á, °üÃøÀÚ°£ ÀÏÄ¡µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ Ä¡¾àÇü ¼º»ó ¿©ºÎ ¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇϴµ¥ À־ÀÇ Áø´ÜÀû Á¤È®µµ(accuracy)¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿©, ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ºÐ·ù¹ýµéÀÌ °¡Áö´Â Áø´ÜÀû °Ë»ç·Î½á ÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Æò°¡ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 2010³â 3¿ùºÎÅÍ 2013³â 9¿ù±îÁö º»¿ø¿¡¼­ °ß°üÀý ¼®È¸¼º °Ç¿°À¸·Î ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·á¸¦ ¹ÞÀº 26¸í ȯÀÚ(26¿¹ °ß °üÀý)¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. °üÀý°æÇÏ¿¡¼­ °üÃøÇÑ ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ¼º»óÀº ÃÑ 26¿¹ Áß 14¿¹¿¡¼­ ºÐÇÊ °¡·ç ÇüÀ̾ú°í, 12¿¹¿¡¼­ Ä¡¾àÇüÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼ö¼ú Àü ´Ü¼ø °ß°üÀý ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç»ó ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ÇüŸ¦ Ga¡§rtner, DePalma, PatteÀÌ ±â¼úÇÑ 3°¡Áö ºÐ·ù ü°è¿¡ µû¶ó °¢°¢ 2ÀÎÀÇ Æò°¡ÀÚ°¡ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Cohen¡¯s kappa¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢ ºÐ·ù¹ýÀÇ °üÃøÀÚ°£ ÀÏÄ¡µµ¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´Ü¼ø ¹æ»ç¼±»ó¿¡¼­ Ga¡§rtner ºÐ·ù IIIÇü, DePalma ºÐ·ù IÇü, Patte ºÐ·ù IIÇüÀÇ °¢ °¢ÀÇ Ä¡¾àÇü ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ¿¹Ãø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Î°¨µµ ¹× ƯÀ̵µ, ¾ç¼º ¿ìµµºñ ¹× À½¼º ¿ìµµºñ, ±×¸®°í Áø´ÜÀû ½Â»êºñ(diagnostic odds ratio)¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ä¡¾àÇü ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹° ¼º»óÀÇ ±âÁØÀº °üÀý°æÇÏ¿¡¼­ °üÃøÇÑ ¼º»óÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ´Ü¼ø ¹æ»ç¼±»ó¿¡¼­ Æò°¡ÇÑ ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ÇüÅ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Æò°¡ÀÚ°£ ½Å·Úµµ´Â Patte ºÐ·ù¿¡¼­ Kappa °ªÀÌ 0.62·Î °¡Àå ³ô¾Ò°í, DePalma°¡ 0.56, Ga¡§rtner°¡ 0.36 ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù. Ä¡¾àÇü ħÂø¹°À» ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â ´Ü¼ø ¹æ»ç¼±»óÀÇ Ä§Âø¹° ÇüÅÂÀÇ ¹Î°¨µµ´Â Ga¡§rtner ºÐ·ù IIIÇü, DePalma ºÐ·ù IÇü, Patte ºÐ·ù IIÇü¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ ¼ø¼­´ë·Î 83.3%, 91.7%, 58.3%¿´À¸¸ç, Ư À̵µ´Â °¢°¢ 85.7%, 50.0%, 64%¿´´Ù. ¾ç¼º ¿ìµµºñ´Â °¢°¢ ¼ø¼­´ë·Î 5.833, 1.833, 1.633¿´À¸¸ç, À½¼º ¿ìµµºñ´Â °¢°¢ 0.194, 0.167, 0.648À̾ú´Ù. Áø´ÜÀû ½Â»êºñ´Â °¢°¢ ¼ø¼­´ë·Î 30.00, 11.00, 2.52À̾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: °ß°üÀýÀÇ ¼®È¸¼º °Ç¿°¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹°ÀÇ ¼º»óÀÇ ¿¹Ãø¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ºÐ·ù¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Æò°¡ °á°ú, Áø´Ü Àû Á¤¹Ðµµ ¹× Á¤È®µµ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ³ôÀº ¼öÄ¡¸¦ º¸ÀÌ´Â ºÐ·ù¹ýÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÃßÈÄ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¿Í °°Àº °Ë»ç¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¼®È¸ ħÂø¹° ¼º»óÀÇ ¿¹Ãø °¡´É ¿©ºÎ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ãß°¡Àû ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
Purpose: The purpose of current study was to evaluate the validity of the existing radiological classifications as a diagnostic modality for predicting characteristics of calcific deposition in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder joint. For that purpose, we determined the inter-observer reliability for evaluating diagnostic precisions of the classification and also evaluated diagnostic accuracy of predicting the toothpaste type calcific deposition.

Materials and Methods: We performed retrospective study with total 26 patients surgically treated with calcific tendinitis of the shoulder joint from March 2010 to October 2013. Two independent observers reviewed preoperative radiographs of shoulder joints, and classified the characteristics of calcific depositions according to the criteria of Gartner, DePalma and Patte. Cohen¡¯s kappa were calculated for each classifications to evaluate inter-observer reliability. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio were determined for type of calcific depositions with Gartner type III, DePalma type I, and Patte type II for predicting toothpaste type calcific deposition.

Results: The values of Cohen¡¯s kappa were the highest in the classification of Patte, 0.62, and the values for the classifications of DePalma and Gartner were 0.56 and 0.36, respectively. The sensitivities for predicting toothpaste type calcific deposition in Gartner Type III, DePalma type I and Patte type II were 83.3%, 91.7%, and 58.3%, respectively. Specificities were 85.7% 50.0% and 64%, positive likelihood ratios were 5.833, 1.833 and 1.633, negative likelihood ratios were 0.194, 0.167 and 0.648, and diagnostic odds ratios were 30.00, 11.00 and 2.52, respectively.

Conclusion: There were no radiologic classifications of calcific tendinitis which has both high precision and accuracy. Further studies with other diagnostic modalities such as ultrasonography are needed for predicting characteristics of calcific deposition in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder joint.

Å°¿öµå

Shoulder joint, Calcific tendinitis, Calcific deposition, Radiologic classifications
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå