µ¿°á°ßÀÇ Áø´Ü°ú Ä¡·á °æ°ú ÆÇÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»çÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º
Usefulness of Ultrasonographic Examination in Diagnosis and Follow-up of the Frozen Shoulder
´ëÇÑÁ¤Çü¿Ü°úÃÊÀ½ÆÄÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 7±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ p.6
ÃÖâÇõ(Choi Chang-Hyuk) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¼®ÁØ(Kim Seok-Jun) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ»óÈ(Lee Sang-Hwa) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èÈñ¼ö(Kim Hee-Soo) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
½ÉÁ¤Çö(Sim Jung-Hyun) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Abstract
¸ñÀû: µ¿°á°ß ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ¸¦ ÅëÇÑ °Ë»ç°¡ Áø´Ü ¹× Ä¡·á ÈÄ ¿¹ÈÄ ÆÇ´Ü¿¡ °´°üÀû ÀÚ·á·Î ¾²ÀÏ ¼ö ÀÖ´ÂÁö È®ÀÎÇϰíÀÚ, Áø´Ü ½Ã ¹× ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å ÁÖ»ç Ä¡·á ÈÄ ¹Ý´ëÃø°ú ºñ±³ °üÂûÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: ÀúÀÚµéÀº 2012³â 7¿ù¿¡¼ 2013³â 7¿ù »çÀÌ, line 1(CBT: ¿À±¸µ¹±â-À̵ΰÇ)°ú line 2(CBG: ¿À±¸µ¹±â-ÀÌ µÎ°Ç °í¶û)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç¸¦ ÅëÇÑ Áø´ÜÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ë»óÀÌ µÈ 20¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å 1ȸ ÁÖ»ç Ä¡·á ÈÄ ±× °á°ú¸¦ 2, 4, 6°³¿ùÀÇ Ã߽à °üÂûÀ» ÅëÇÏ¿© ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ ¿¬¼Ó °Ë»ç »ó Âü°í¼±ÀÇ È£Àü Á¤µµ ¹× °ß°üÀý ¿îµ¿ ¹üÀ§ ȸº¹ Á¤ µµ¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç»ó È¯Ãø°ú °ÇÃøÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â Ä¡·á Àü CBTÀÌ Á߸³, ¿ÜȸÀü, ³»È¸Àü¿¡¼ °¢°¢ -5.6 mm, -5.0 mm, -4.3 mm¿´À¸¸ç CBG´Â -6.1 mm, -4.7 mm, -5.0 mmÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç(p<0.05), 2°³¿ù(CBT: -4.8 mm, -3.5 mm, -2.6 mm/ CBG: -4.7 mm, -4.0 mm, -3.6 mm), 4°³¿ù(CBT: -4.7 mm, -3.2 mm, -1.7 mm/CBG: -4.3 mm, -3.7 mm, - 1.2 mm), 6°³¿ù(CBT: -1.1 mm, -2.9 mm, -0.5 mm / CBG: -1.2 mm, -0.7 mm, -0.9 mm)·Î½á ³»È¸ÀüÀº 4°³ ¿ù, Á߸³ ¹× ¿ÜȸÀüÀº 6°³¿ù ÀÌÈÄ È£ÀüµÇ´Â ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿´´Ù(p<0.05). ¿îµ¿ ¹üÀ§´Â Ä¡·á Àü Àü¹æ°Å»ó, ¿ÜȸÀü, ³»È¸ÀüÀÌ 108µµ, 32µµ, L5, 2°³¿ù¿¡´Â 117µµ, 35µµ, L4, 4°³¿ù¿¡´Â 133µµ, 42µµ, L3, 6°³¿ù¿¡´Â 136µµ, 47µµ, L2·Î½á 4°³¿ù ÀÌ ÈÄ À¯ÀÇÇÑ È¸º¹¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ½Ã°¢ÅëÁõµî±Þ(VAS)Àº Ä¡·áÀü 7.5¿¡¼ 2°³¿ù¿¡´Â 3.0À¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ È£ÀüÀ» º¸¿´´Ù (p<0.05).
°á·Ð: ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å ÁÖ»ç Ä¡·á ÈÄ Âü°í¼±Àº 6°³¿ù ÈÄ È¸º¹µÇ´Â ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿©, ¿îµ¿ ¹üÀ§´Â 4°³¿ù ÈÄ, ÅëÁõÀº 2°³¿ù ÈÄ È£Àü À» º¸ÀÎ °Í¿¡ ºñÇØ ´Ù¼Ò Áö¿¬µÇ¾î ³ªÅ¸³ª´Â °æÇâÀ̾ú´Ù. µ¿Àû ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ °Ë»ç´Â µ¿°á°ß ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ Áø´Ü ¹× ¿¹ÈÄ ÆÇ´Ü ½Ã À¯È¿ÇÑ °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ÀÌ¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÇ¾ú´Ù.
Purpose: In order to know the effectiveness of ultrasonographic examination in diagnosis and follow-up evaluation for the frozen shoulder, we compared those with contralateral side in initial and after steroid injection.
Materials and Methods: For the 20 unilateral frozen shoulder from July 2012 to July 2013, ultrasonographic examination was tried using reference line 1 (CBT: distance from coracoid process to LHB tendon) and line 2 (CBG: distance from coracoid process to bicipital groove). We tried 1 time steroid injection and compared the improvement in gross motion and reference line with 2 month, 4 month, and 6 month¡¯s serial ultrasonographic examination.
Results: The differences on CBT line between lesion side and normal side were -5.6 mm, -5.0 mm, and -4.3 mm in neutral (Neut), external rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR), respectively. The differences on CBG line were -6.1 mm, -4.7 mm, and -5.0 mm respectively (p<0.05). The changes in the reference line after steroid injection were evaluated at 2 month (CBT: -4.8 mm, -3.5 mm, -2.6 mm / CBG: -4.7 mm, -4.0 mm, -3.6 mm), 4 month (CBT: -4.7 mm, -3.2 mm, -1.7 mm / CBG: -4.3 mm, -3.7 mm, -1.2 mm), and 6 month (CBT: -1.1 mm, -2.9 mm, -0.5 mm / CBG: -1.2 mm, -0.7 mm, - 0.9 mm). The gross motion was improved at 4 month after injection, from elevation 108¡Æ, ER 32¡Æ, IR L5 in initial to 133¡Æ, 42¡Æ, L3 respectively (p<0.05). Pain improved from 7.5 in initial to 3.0 at 2 month on visual analog scale (VAS).
Conclusion: The serial examination after steroid injection revealed that the delayed improvement on reference line (6 month) compared with pain (2 month) or gross motion (4 month). Dynamic ultrasonogram was useful in diagnosis and follow-up evaluation of frozen shoulder.
Ű¿öµå
Frozen shoulder, Ultrasonogram, Steroid Injection
KMID :
1195520140070010001
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)