¸¾Äû½ºÆ® »ý»ê¼º Áö¼ö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Áö¿ªº° º¸°ÇÀÇ·á »ý»ê¼º Ãß¼¼ ºÐ¼®(2002-2011)
Analysis on Healthcare Productivity Trend by Region Using Malmquist Productivity Index(2002-2011)

º¸°Ç°æÁ¦¿Í Á¤Ã¥¿¬±¸ 2014³â 20±Ç 1È£ p.63 ~ p.86

Á¶À翵(Cho Jae-Young) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø º¸°ÇÇàÁ¤Çаú
À̱¤¼ö(Lee Kwang-Soo) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç°úÇдëÇÐ º¸°ÇÇàÁ¤Çаú
Á¤Çö¼±(Jeong Hyoung-Sun) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ º¸°Ç°úÇдëÇÐ º¸°ÇÇàÁ¤Çаú

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â 2002³âºÎÅÍ 2011³â±îÁö 16°³ ±¤¿ª½Ã¤ýµµÀÇ 10³â°£ÀÇ ÆÐ³ÎÀڷḦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¿ì¸®³ª¶óÀÇ Áö¿ªº° º¸°ÇÀÇ·á ÀÚ¿ø ÀÌ¿ëÀÇ »ý»ê¼º º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ù°, ¸¾Äû½ºÆ® »ý»ê¼º Áö¼ö(Malmquist Productivity Index, MPI)¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ¼­ º» ¿ì¸®³ª¶ó º¸°ÇÀÇ·á »ý»ê¼ºÀº ¸Å³â Æò±Õ 1.8%ÀÌ»ó Áõ°¡Çß´Ù. ¿©±â¼­ÀÇ ``»ý»ê¼º Áõ°¡``´Â º¸°ÇÀÇ·á ÀÚ¿øÀÇ ÅõÀÔ¿¡ ºñÇÏ¿© Áø·á·®°ú Áø·á°­µµ°¡ ³ô¾ÆÁø °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. ³»¿øÀϼö¸¦ »êÃ⺯¼ö·Î ÇÑ ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ Áø·á·®ÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¿ä¾ç±Þ¿©ºñ¸¦ »êÃ⺯¼ö·Î ÇÑ ¸ðÇü¿¡¼­ ¼­ºñ½º Ç׸ñº°·Î °¡Á߯ò±Õ Áø·á·®°ú Áø·á °­µµÀÇ Áõ°¡¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. »ý»ê¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ÁÖ·Î ``±â¼úÀÇ Áøº¸``¿Í ``¼ø¼ö±â¼úÀû È¿À²¼º``ÀÇ °³¼±¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °ÍÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, ``±Ô¸ðÈ¿À²¼º``Àº »ý»ê¼º Áõ°¡¿¡ °ÅÀÇ ±â¿©ÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÑ°, Áö¿ªº°·Î »ý»ê¼º º¯È­ÀÇ °ÝÂ÷´Â ¸Å¿ì ÄÇÀ¸¸ç ±× Ãß¼¼´Â °è¼ÓµÇ¾ú´Ù. °¡Àå Å« Áõ°¡°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´ø Áö¿ªÀº 2002³â-2011³â »çÀÌ¿¡ ¾à 63%°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´°í, ¹Ý¸é¿¡ °¨¼Ò°¡ ÄÇ´ø Áö¿ªÀº ¾à 14%ÀÇ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. »ý»ê¼ºÀÇ Áõ°¡°¡ Å« Áö¿ªÀº ÀüºÏ, Àü³², °­¿ø, °æ³² Áö¿ªÀ̾ú°í, »ý»ê¼ºÀÇ °¨¼Ò°¡ Å« Áö¿ªÀº ´ëÀüÀ̾ú´Ù. Áö¿ªº° »ý»ê¼º º¯È­ÀÇ °ÝÂ÷´Â º¸°ÇÀÇ·á ÀÚ¿ø ºÐÆ÷ ¹× °í·É Àα¸ÀÇ ºñÁß µî°ú °ü·ÃÀÌ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.
This study analyzed the productivity trend of healthcare resources by region in Korea. Malmquist Productivity Index(MPI) was produced with the panel data of 16 metropolitan cities for 10 years from 2002 to 2011. The results of the analysis were as follows. First, MPI from 2002 to 2011 was increased by an annual average of more than 1.8%. The productivity increase was due mainly to technical progress and the improvement of pure technical efficiency, and the scale efficiency hardly contributed to the productivity increase. Second, there were big differences in productivity changes by regions and these trends were continued for study years. Regions that had the greatest increase showed about a 63% increase from 2002 to 2011 while regions that had the biggest decrease showed about a 14% decrease. Jeonbuk, Jeonnam, Gangwon, and Gyeongnam showed high productivity increases, while Daejeon had a big productivity decrease. Future studies will need to analyze factors contributing the differences of productivity among regions.

Ű¿öµå

ÀÚ·áÆ÷¶ôºÐ¼®, È¿À²¼º, ¸¾Äû½ºÆ® »ý»ê¼º Áö¼ö, º¸°ÇÀÇ·á ÀÚ¿ø, ÀÇ·á Á¤Ã¥
DEA, Efficiency, Malmquist Productivity Index, MPI, Health care resource, Health policy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå