ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾ÏÀÇ Á¦ÇÑµÈ °¢µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼¼±âº¯Á¶¿Í ¿ëÀûº¯Á¶È¸Àü ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á°èȹÀÇ Æó ¼±·®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸
A Study on lung dose of Intensity modulated and volumetric modulated arc therapy plans using restricted angle of Non-small cell lung cancer

´ëÇѹæ»ç¼±Ä¡·áÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 26±Ç 1È£ p.21 ~ p.28

¿°¹Ì¼÷(Yeom Mi-Suk) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¹æ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇаú
ÀÌ¿ì¼®(Lee Woo-Suk) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¹æ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇаú
±è´ë¼·(Kim Dae-Sup) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¹æ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇаú
¹é±Ý¹®(Back Geum-Mun) - ¼­¿ï¾Æ»êº´¿ø ¹æ»ç¼±Á¾¾çÇаú

Abstract

¸ñ Àû : ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾ÏÀÇ Ä¡·á¿ëÀûÀÇ Å©±â°¡ Å©°Å³ª Æó ¿ëÀûÀÌ ÀÛ°í, ¸öÀÇ Á¤Áß¼±(Mid line)¿¡ À§Ä¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì ô¼öÀÇ Çã¿ë¼±·®À» °í·ÁÇÑ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á°èȹ¿¡¼­ Æó ¼±·®ÀÌ ¸¹¾ÆÁö°Ô µÇ´Âµ¥, º» ¿¬±¸´Â ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾Ï ȯÀÚÀÇ 3Â÷¿øÀÔüÁ¶ÇüÄ¡·á(Three dimensional conformal radiotherapy, 3D CRT), Á¦ÇÑµÈ °¢µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¼¼±âº¯Á¶¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á(Intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT)¿Í ¿ëÀûº¯Á¶È¸ÀüÄ¡·á(Volumetric Modulated Arc therapy, VMAT) Ä¡·á°èȹÀ» °¢°¢ Àû¿ëÇÏ¿© Àüü Æó ¼±·®À» ºñ±³ ¹× Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý : TrueBeam STx(VarianTM, USA) 10 MV ¿¡³ÊÁö¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© 4¸íÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© 3D CRT, Á¦ÇÑµÈ °¢µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ IMRT¿Í VMAT Ä¡·á°èȹÀ» ¼¼¿ì°í, ÃÑ ¼±·® 66 Gy/30 Fx ó¹æÇÏ¿´À» ¶§, ¼±·®¿ëÀûÈ÷½ºÅä±×·¥(Dose Volume Histogram, DVH)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Ä¡·á°èȹ¿ëÀû(Planning Target Volume, PTV), Àüü Æó ±×¸®°í ô¼ö¿¡ µé¾î°¡´Â ¼±·®À» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. PTV¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ã³¹æ¼±·®Áö¼ö(Conformity Index, CI), ¼±·®±ÕÁúÁö¼ö(Homogeneity index, HI), ó¹æ¼±·®Æ÷ÇÔÁö¼ö(Paddick¡¯s Conformity Index, PCI)¸¦ ±¸ÇÏ°í, ÆóÀÇ 30 Gy ¿ëÀû(V30), V20, V10, V5, Æò±Õ¼±·®(Mean dose)À» Æò°¡ÇÏ°í, ô¼öÀÇ ÃÖ´ë¼±·® °ªÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á °ú : PTV¿¡ ´ëÇÑ CI, HI, PCIÀÇ Æò±Õ°ªÀº °¢°¢ 0.944¡¾0.009, 1.106¡¾0.027, 1.084¡¾0.016À¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. Àüü Æó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Ã¹ ¹ø° ȯÀÚÀÇ V20Àº 3D CRT, IMRT, VMAT °¢°¢ 30.7%, 20.2%. 21.2%, µÎ ¹ø° ȯÀÚÀÇ V20Àº 33.0%, 29.2%. 31.5%, ¼¼ ¹ø° ȯÀÚÀÇ V20Àº 51.3%, 34.3%.36.9%, ³× ¹ø° ȯÀÚÀÇ V20Àº 56.9%, 33.7%. 40%·Î Á¦ÇÑµÈ °¢µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ IMRT Ä¡·á°èȹ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ³·°Ô Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù. ô¼ö¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÃÖ´ë¼±·® °ªÀº ¸ðµÎ Çã¿ë¼±·® ¹Ì¸¸À¸·Î Æò°¡µÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á ·Ð : ºñ¼Ò¼¼Æ÷ Æó¾ÏÀÇ ¹æ»ç¼±Ä¡·á°èȹ¿¡¼­ 3D CRT¿Í ºñ±³ÇßÀ» ¶§, Á¦ÇÑµÈ °¢µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ IMRT³ª VAMTÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇϸé ô¼öÀÇ Çã¿ë¼±·®À» ³ÑÁö¾ÊÀ¸¸é¼­ Æó ¼±·®À» ÁÙ¿©ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â Ä¡·á°èȹÀ» ¼¼¿ï ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. IMRT¿Í VAMTÀ» ºñ±³Çغ¸¸é PTVÀÇ ¼±·®Æ÷ÇÔ°ú ô¼ö¼±·®À» °í·ÁÇßÀ» ¶§ IMRT Ä¡·á°èȹ¿¡¼­ º¸´Ù Á¼Àº °¢µµ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Ä¡·á°èȹÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´°í, ÀÌ´Â Æó ¼±·®À» Á» ´õ ÁÙ¿©ÁÙ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â °á°ú¸¦ ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
Purpose : For non-small cell lung cancer, if the treatment volume is large or the total lung volume is small, and the tumor is located in midline of patient¡¯s body, total lung dose tends to increase due to tolerance dose of spinal cord. The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the total lung dose of three dimensional conformal radiotherapy(3D CRT), intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT) using restricted angle for non-small cell lung cancer patients.

Materials and Methods : The treatment plans for four patients, being treated on TrueBeam STx(VarianTM, USA) with 10 MV and prescribed dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions, 3D CRT, restricted angle IMRT and VAMT radiotherapy plans were established. Planning target volume(PTV), dose to total lung and spinal cord were evaluated using the dose volume histogram(DVH). Conformity index(CI), homogeneity index(HI), Paddick¡¯s index(PCI) for the PTV, V30, V20, V10, V5, mean dose for total lung and maximum dose for spinal cord was assessed.

Results : Average value of CI, HI and PCI for PTV was 0.944¡¾0.009, 1.106¡¾0.027 and 1.084¡¾0.016 respectively. V20 values
from 3D CRT, IMRT and VMAT plans were 30.7%, 20.2% and 21.2% for the first patient, 33.0%, 29.2% and 31.5% for second
patient, 51.3%, 34.3% and 36.9% for third patient, finally 56.9%, 33.7% and 40.0% for the last patient. It was noticed that the
V20 was lowest in the IMRT plan using restricted angle. Maximum dose for spinal cord was evaluated to lower than the
tolerance dose.

Conclusion : For non-small cell lung cancer, IMRT with restricted angle or VMAT could minimize the lung dose and lower the dose to spinal cord below the tolerance level. Considering PTV coverage and tolerance dose to spinal cord, it was possible to obtain IMRT plan with smaller angle and this could result in lower dose to lung when compared to VMAT.

Å°¿öµå

¿ëÀûº¯Á¶È¸ÀüÄ¡·á, Á¦ÇÑµÈ °¢µµ, ¼±·®¿ëÀûÈ÷½ºÅä±×·¥, ó¹æ¼±·®Æ÷ÇÔÁö¼ö
Volumetric modulated arc therapy(VMAT), restricted angle, dose volume histogram (DVH), Paddick¡¯s index(PCI)
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
IMRT with restricted angle or VMAT could minimize the lung dose and lower the dose to spinal cord below the tolerance level for non-small cell lung cancer.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå