ÃʵîÇб³ ÀúÇгâ°ú °íÇгâÀÇ Çö¼º±¼Àý°Ë»ç¿Í Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»çÀÇ ºñ±³
Comparison between Manifest Refraction and Cycloplegic Refraction of elementary school the lower grades and the upper grades
´ëÇѽðúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 16±Ç 2È£ p.141 ~ p.148
³ªÈÆÅÃ(Na Hun-Taek) - °¸ª¿µµ¿´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú
Á¤¸Í½Ä(Joung Maeng-Sig) - °¸ª¿µµ¿´ëÇÐ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú
±èÈ«¼±(Kim Hong-Seon) - °¸ª¿µµ¿´ëÇб³ ¾È°æ±¤Çаú
Abstract
¸ñ Àû: º» ¿¬±¸´Â ÃʵîÇлýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Çö¼º±¼Àý°Ë»ç¿Í Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»ç °á°ú¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ°í ÀúÇгâ°ú °íÇгâÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
¹æ ¹ý: ±Ù½ÃÀÎ ÀúÇгâ(1.2.3Çгâ) 91¸í 182¾È, °íÇгâ(4.5.6Çгâ) 58¸í116¾ÈÃÑ298¾ÈÀ»´ë»óÀ¸·ÎÁ¶Àý¸¶ ºñÁ¦¿Í ¹Ìµå¸°ÇǸ¦ Á¡¾È Àü°ú ÈÄ¿¡ ÀÚµ¿±¼Àý°Ë»ç±â¿Í °Ë¿µ±â·Î ±¼Àý°Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á °ú: Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ Àü°ú ÈÄ¿¡ ±¸¸é±¼Àý·ÂÀº °¢°¢ ?1.23¡¾0.80D¿Í ?1.08¡¾0.83D·Î Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»çÀÇ ±Ù½Ãµµ°¡0.16¡¾0.24D (t=-2.182 p<0.05) ³·°ÔÃøÁ¤µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ³½Ã±¼Àý·ÂÀº?0.70¡¾0.56D¿Í-0.59¡¾0.60D·Î Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»çÀÇ ³½Ãµµ°¡ 0.11¡¾0.14D ³·°Ô ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù(t=-1.329 p<0.19). ÀúÇг⿡¼´Â °¢°¢ -1.22¡¾0.63D, -1.07¡¾0.72D·Î Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»çÀÇ ±Ù½Ãµµ°¡ 0.16¡¾0.26D (t=-2.004 p<0.05) ³·°Ô ÃøÁ¤ µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, °íÇг⿡¼´Â °¢°¢ ?1.23¡¾0.98D, -1.09¡¾0.96D·Î Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»çÀÇ ±Ù½Ãµµ°¡ 0.15 ¡¾0.19D
(t=-1.121 p<0.27) ³·°Ô ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù.
°á ·Ð: ÃʵîÇлýÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î Çö¼º±¼Àý°Ë»ç¿Í Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»ç±¼Àý·ÂÀ» ºñ±³Çغ» °á°ú±¸¸é±¼Àý·Â¿¡¼ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´Áö¸¸, °æµµ±Ù½ÃÀÎ ÀúÇгâ°ú °íÇгâÀÇ Çö¼º±¼Àý°Ë»ç¿Í Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»çÀÇ °¨¼Ò·® Â÷ÀÌ´Â °ÅÀÇ ¾ø¾ú´Ù.
Purpose: For this study, the elementary school students compared manifest refraction and cycloplegic refraction, and investigate difference between the lower grades and the upper grades.
Methods: Myopia in the lower grades (grade 1.2.3) 91 people(182eyes), the upper grades (Grades 4.5.6) 58 people(116eyes), 298 eyes of total the change of refractive error for noncycloplegic and cycloplegic were measured using autofractometer and retinoscope.
Results: The spherical refraction of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic measured -1.23 ¡¾ 0.80D and -1.08 ¡¾ 0.83D, respectively, myopia of cycloplegic refraction was lower than manifest refraction by 0.16 ¡¾ 0.24D (t = -2.182 p <0.05). Cylinder refraction of noncycloplegic and cycloplegic measured -0.70 ¡¾ 0.56D and 0.59 ¡¾ 0.60D, astigmatism of cycloplegic refraction ? was lower than manifest refraction by 0.11 ¡¾ 0.14D (t=-1.329 p<0.19). The lower grades, each -1.22 ¡¾ 0.63D, -1.07 ¡¾ 0.72D of myopia is also a cycloplegic refraction was lower than manifest refraction by 0.16 ¡¾ 0.26D (t =
-2.004 p <0.05), the upper grades, each -1.23 ¡¾ 0.98D, -1.09 ¡¾ 0.96D cycloplegic refraction was lower than manifest refraction by 0.15 ¡¾ 0.19 (t = -1.121 p <0.27).
Conclusions: The results compared of elementary school students manifest refraction and cycloplegic refraction was significant difference on spherical refraction, but manifest refraction and cycloplegic refraction of low myopia lower grades and upper grades there were hardly any differences in the amount of reduction.
Å°¿öµå
Çö¼º±¼Àý°Ë»ç, Á¶Àý¸¶ºñ±¼Àý°Ë»ç, ÃʵîÇлý, Çгâ
Manifest Refraction, Cycloplegic Refraction, elementary school students, grades
KMID :
1159320140160020141
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)