Changes in pulse transit time according to target controlled infusion of propofol versus sevoflurane inhalation induction

Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 2014³â 9±Ç 1È£ p.48 ~ p.53

(Youn Ann Mi-Sun) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
½Å¿ë¼·(Shin Yong-Sup) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
¹Ú»óÀÏ(Park Sang-Il) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Abstract

Background: Pulse transit time (PTT), the time it takes a pulse wave to travel from one arterial site to another, is a noninvasive indicator of arterial stiffness. The main objective of our study was to compare two common anesthetic techniques using PTT in order to explore which technique would bring more vascular distention.

Methods: Sixty female patients, ages 18?65, classified by ASA 1 or 2 undergoing general anesthesia, were randomly allocated into two groups, S and P. Group S (n = 30) was inducted with 2 mg/kg of propofol and remifentanil 5.0 ng/ml. Group P (n = 30) was induc-ted with propofol 4.0 ug/ml and remifentanil 4.0 ng/ml using a target controlled infusion (TCI) pump. Group S was anesthetically mainta-ined with sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC and 1.0 ng/ml remifentanil while group P was anesthetically maintained with propofol 3.0 ug/ml and remifentanil 1.0 ng/ml for 10 minutes. PTT values were obtained by measuring the distance between the electrocardiographic R wave, which approximates the opening of the aortic valve, to the radial artery. Three consecutive values of prePTT, postPTT, and corresponding vital signs were measured and recorded before and 10 minutes after anesthetic induction.

Results: PrePTT in group S and group P was 240.18 ¡¾ 3.66 and 239.32 ¡¾ 3.69 ms, respectively. Ten minutes after anesthetic induc-tion, postPTT in group S increased to 284.16 ¡¾ 4.37 ms while postPTT in group P increased to 278.7 ¡¾ 4.53 ms (P £¾ 0.05). However, despite the slope of group S (43.98 ¡¾ 22.18) being greater than group P (39.38 ¡¾ 18.39), the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.2239).

Conclusions: Changes in PTT values were statistically insignifi-cant regarding arterial distension in patients anesthetized with target controlled infusion of propofol compared to those with balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane.

Ű¿öµå

Pulse transit time, Pulse wave velocity, Ultraso-nography
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå