±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý¹ý°ú Àå¾ÖÀκ¹Áö¹ýÀÇÀå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤±âÁØ ÀÏ¿øÈ­ÀÇ Å¸´ç¼º °íÂû
A Review on the Validity of the Unification of Disability Judgement Criteria for National Pension Act and Welfare of the Disabled Act

»çȸº¸À忬±¸ 2014³â 30±Ç 1È£ p.231 ~ p.255

Á¤Àοµ(Jung In-Young) - ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý¿¬±¸¿ø
À±»ó¿ë(Yoon Sang-yong) - ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ¾Æµ¿º¹ÁöÇаú

Abstract

ÇöÀç ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý°ø´Ü¿¡¼­ ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â Àå¾Ö½É»ç´Â ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý¹ý»ó Àå¾Ö¿¬±Ý½É»ç¿Í Àå¾ÖÀκ¹Áö¹ý»ó Àå¾Öµî±Þ½É»ç·Î ÀÌ¿øÈ­ µÇ¾îÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý¹ý°ú Àå¾ÖÀκ¹Áö¹ýÀÇ Àå¾Ö°³³ä ¹× Àå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤±âÁØ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÌ°í ü°èÀûÀÎ ºñ±³ºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ, µÎ ¹ýÀÇ À¯»çÁ¡°ú Â÷ÀÌÁ¡À» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ°í ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇÑ ¹®Á¦Á¡À» ÆľÇÇϸç, µÎ ¹ýÀÇ Àå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤±âÁØ ÀÏ¿øÈ­ÀÇ Å¸´ç¼ºÀ» °ËÅäÇϴµ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. ¿¬±¸°á°ú µÎ ¹ýÀÇ Á¦Á¤ ¸ñÀû ¹× Àå¾Ö°³³ä°ú °ü·ÃÇؼ­´Â ºñ±³Àû ¸íÈ®ÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¹ß°ßµÇ´Â ¹Ý¸é, Àå¾ÖÀ¯Çü ¹× Àå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤±âÁØ°ú °ü·ÃÇؼ­´Â »ó´ëÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÏÄ¡ ¶Ç´Â À¯»çÇÑ ºÎºÐÀÌ Àִ°¡ ÇÏ¸é »óÀÌÇÑ ºÎºÐµµ Á¸ÀçÇÔÀÌ È®ÀεȴÙ. ÇöÇà ±¹¹Î¿¬±Þ¹ý°ú Àå¾ÖÀκ¹Áö¹ýÀÇ Àå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤±âÁØ ¹× µî±Þ±âÁØÀº ½ÇÁ¦ µî±Þ °£ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ À־ ÇÕ¸®ÀûÀÌÁö ¾Ê°í ÀÏ°ü¼ºÀÌ °á¿©µÇ¾î ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ·Î ÀÎÇØ Àå¾ÖÀ¯Çü ³»ÀÇ µî±Þ °£ Â÷ÀÌ¿Í Àå¾ÖÀ¯Çü °£ÀÇ µî±Þ °£ Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¹ß»ýÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ°ÍÀ» ÀÏ°ü¼º ÀÖ°Ô Á¶Á¤ÇÒ ÇÊ¿ä°¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ±×¸®°í À̸¦ À§ÇØ ÀÇÇÐÀû ¼Õ»ó Æò°¡ ±âÁØÀÇ ÀÏ°ü¼ºÀÇ ÀÏ¿øÈ­°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù°í ÆǴܵȴÙ.µÎ ¹ýÀÇ ÀÇÇÐÀû ¼Õ»ó ±âÁØÀÇ ÀÏ°ü¼ºÀÇ ÀÏ¿øÈ­´Â ÇàÁ¤Àû ºñÈ¿À²¼º, µî±Þ°áÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °í°´ÀÇ ºÒ¸¸Á¦±â ¹× °ø´ÜÀÇ Àå¾Ö½É»ç¾÷¹«¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å·Úµµ ÀúÇÏÀÇ ¹®Á¦¸¦ ÇØ°áÇϴµ¥ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ¹æ¾ÈÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ¿¹»óµÈ´Ù.
This study compares the concepts of disability and disability judgement criteria for National Pension Act and Welfare of the Disabled Act. First, it analyzes the similarities and differences between the two Acts and explores what the problems derived from them are. Second, it examines whether the unification of the judgement criteria for the two Acts are adequate. The results of the analysis show though there are comparatively clear distinctions of the objectives and concepts of disability for the two Acts, it is also found that there are both similarities and differences with regard to disability types and judgement criteria. The current disability judgement criteria for the two Acts are not reasonable and the lack of consistency because there are differences between the grades of disability. This causes discrepancies between the grades within a disability type and those between the grades among the disability types. Therefore it is needed to improve the consistency and for this, the unification of the consistency of the impairment based Barema methods for the two Acts is needed.

Å°¿öµå

±¹¹Î¿¬±Ý¹ý, Àå¾ÖÀκ¹Áö¹ý, Àå¾ÖÆÇÁ¤±âÁØ, Àå¾Öµî±Þ±âÁØ, Àå¾Ö°³³ä, Á¤ÀÇ
National Pension Act, Welfare of the Disabled Act, disability judgement criteria, disability grades criteria, concept, definition of disability
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå