ÆÄ¿­°£¼¼Æ÷¾ÏÀÇ °£Ç÷°üÁ¶¿µ¼ú¿¡¼­ÀÇ ¼Ò°ß: Sentinel Signs¿Í ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Á¶¿µÁ¦ À¯Ãâ¼Ò°ß°úÀÇ ºñ±³
Hepatic Angiographic Findings of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma: "Sentinel Signs" versus Extravasation

´ëÇÑ¿µ»óÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 70±Ç 5È£ p.335 ~ p.342

À±¼ºÁ¾(Yun Seong-Jong) - Kyung Hee University School of Medicine Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong Department of Radiology
³²´öÈ£(Nam Deok-Ho) - Kyung Hee University School of Medicine Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong Department of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose: This study retrospectively compared the accuracy of angiographic sentinel signs (sentinel vessels, hypovascular areas, and delayed dots) with extravasation in the diagnosis of ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and Methods: Sixteen patients diagnosed with HCC between March 2007 and November 2011 were evaluated. Among the patients, we identified 32 HCCs (19 ruptured, 13 unruptured), and assessed all HCCs by hepatic angiography with regard to extravasation, sentinel vessels, hypovascular areas, and delayed dots. We compared the sensitivity and specificity of the sentinel signs with those of the extravasation for the diagnosis of a ruptured HCC.

Results: For the angiographic diagnosis of a ruptured HCC, the sensitivity of the sentinel signs (sentinel vessel, 63.2%; hypovascular area, 89.5%; delayed dot, 72.7%) was higher than the sensitivity of extravasation (15.8%). The difference in sensitivity between each sentinel sign and extravasation was statistically significant (sentinel vessel, p = 0.012; hypovascular area, p < 0.001; delayed dot, p = 0.039). The specificity of sentinel signs for the diagnosis of ruptured HCC was not statistically different from the specificity of extravasation.

Conclusion: Sentinel signs are more accurate than extravasation for the angiographic diagnosis of a ruptured HCC.

Ű¿öµå

Angiography, Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Spontaneous Rupture, Extravasation of Contrast Media, Therapeutic Embolization
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå