KCTBASE

역동적 조영증강 자기공명영상의 지연기 영상에서 간 실질의 조영증강 양상:Gd-EOB-DTPA와 Gd-DTPA-BMA의 비교
Enhancement Pattern of Liver Parenchyma during Late Dynamic Phase Imaging: Comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA

대한영상의학회지 2014년 70권 4호 p.269 ~ p.277

(Jo Jae-Myeong) - Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital Department of Radiology
신상수(Shin Sang-Soo) - Chonnam National University Medical School Department of Radiology
김진웅(Kim Jin-Woong) - Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital Department of Radiology
허숙희(Heo Suk-Hee) - Chonnam National University Medical School Department of Radiology
정용연(Jeong Yong-Yeon) - Chonnam National University Medical School Department of Radiology
강형근(Kang Heoung-Keun) - Chonnam National University Medical School Department of Radiology

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the differences in enhancement patterns of liver parenchyma during the late dynamic phase imaging between gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA) and gadolinium-diethylenetriamine-pentaacetic acid-bismethylamide (Gd-DTPA-BMA).

Materials and Methods: 130 patients (88 men and 42 women at the mean age of 59.4 years) and 110 patients (72 men and 38 women at the mean age of 60.2 years) underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, using Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA, respectively, at 3T MR scanner. In both groups, the patients were divided into three categories: category I for normal liver, category II for Child A cirrhotic liver, and category III for Child B and C cirrhotic liver. Late dynamic phase scanning was performed at 100, 140, and 180 seconds after injection of the contrast agent. The injected dose of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA was 0.025 mmol/kg of the body weight and 0.1 mmol/kg of the body weight, respectively. Signal intensity ratio of the liver (SIRL), contrast ratio between liver and portal vein (LPC), and contrast ratio between liver and spleen (LSC) were calculated and compared between Gd-EOB-DTPA group and Gd-DTPA-BMA group according to the scan delay time.

Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in respect to demographic characteristics. SIRL of Gd-EOB-DTPA group was significantly lower at 100 seconds in category I, and also at 100 and 140 seconds in category II (p < 0.05). In Gd-EOB-DTPA group, LPC and LSC showed an increasing trend according to the delayed time in all of the categories. In Gd-DTPA-BMA group, LPC and LSC showed similar values according to the delayed time in all of the categories. LPC of Gd-EOB-DTPA group was significantly higher at 100, 140, and 180 seconds in category I and II (p < 0.05). LSC of Gd-EOB-DTPA group was significantly higher at 100, 140, and 180 seconds in category I, II, and III (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: In contrast to Gd-DTPA-BMA, the late phase imaging using Gd-EOB-DTPA was affected by intracellular distribution of the contrast agent, which was proportional to the elapsed time after the injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA.

키워드

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Gadolinium Ethoxybenzyl Diethylenetriamine-Pentaacetic Acid, Gadodiamide

KMID : 1103720140700040269

원문 및 링크아웃 정보

등재저널 정보

주제코드

주제명(Target field)

연구대상(Population)

연구참여(Sample size)

대상성별(Gender)

질병특성(Condition Category)

연구환경(Setting)

연구설계(Study Design)

연구기간(Period)

중재방법(Intervention Type)

중재명칭(Intervention Name)

키워드(Keyword)

유효성결과(Recomendation)

연구비지원(Fund Source)

근거수준평가(Evidence Hierarchy)

출판년도(Year)

참여저자수(Authors)

대표저자

DOI

KCD코드

ICD 03

건강보험코드

역동적 조영증강 자기공명영상의 지연기 영상에서 간 실질의 조영증강 양상:Gd-EOB-DTPA와 Gd-DTPA-BMA의 비교 Enhancement Pattern of Liver Parenchyma during Late Dynamic Phase Imaging: Comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA

Abstract

키워드

역동적 조영증강 자기공명영상의 지연기 영상에서 간 실질의 조영증강 양상:Gd-EOB-DTPA와 Gd-DTPA-BMA의 비교
Enhancement Pattern of Liver Parenchyma during Late Dynamic Phase Imaging: Comparison between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA-BMA