ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ¾öÁö¹ß°¡¶ô °¡ÂÊÈÚÁõ ȯÀÚÀÇ ¹ß¹Ù´Ú ¾Ð·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ
The Effect of Intervention on Hallux Valgus Patient¡¯s Foot Pressure
´ëÇÑÅëÇÕÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2015³â 3±Ç 2È£ p.63 ~ p.72
±èÈ£¼º(Kim Ho-Sung) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú
±è¸íö(Kim Myung-Chul) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú
À̹μö(Lee Min-Soo) - À»Áö´ëÇб³ ¹°¸®Ä¡·áÇаú
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the foot pressure of subjects with hallux valgus following conservative management.
Methods: The subjects (20 females) were divided into 2 groups; Hallux valgus group (10) and Control group (10) who could evaluate questionnaire & weight bearing X-ray. All the participants were evaluated distribution of foot pressure by Zebris FDM-S system with conservative management (taping therapy and hallux valgus device) during single-limb stance.
Results: The Hallux valgus group (HVG) was significantly different than Control group (CG) in hallux valgus angle(p<0.05). The Hallux valgus group with Foot Device (HVG-FD), Hallux valgus group with Taping (HVG-Tp) and Hallux valgus group with Foot device and Taping (HVG-FD&Tp) was not significantly different than CG in hallux valgus angle (p<0.05). The HVG was not significantly different than CG in forefoot (p1, p2, p3), significantly different than CG in rearfoot (p7) about foot pressure during single-limb stance (p<0.05). The HVG-FO and HVG-FO and TP was significantly different than HVG in forefoot (p1, p2, p3), on significantly different than HVG in rearfoot (p7) about foot pressure during single-limb stance (p<0.05). There was significantly correlation HVG-FO and HVG-FO & TP in forefoot (p1, p2, p3) was negative correlation (p<0.05) and in rearfoot (p7) was positive correlation (p<0.05).
Conclusion: This study showed that hallux valgus were effected hallux valgus angle and foot pressure by various treatment methods during single-limb stance. Further study is needed to measure various age and work with hallux valgus for clinical application.
Å°¿öµå
foot pressure, hallux valgus, hallux valgus device, hallux valgus tapping
KMID :
1035420150030020063
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
The Hallux valgus group with Foot Device (HVG-FD), Hallux valgus group with Taping (HVG-Tp) and Hallux valgus group with Foot device and Taping (HVG-FD&Tp) was not significantly different than CG in hallux valgus angle (p<0.05).