WHO °í·Éģȭµµ½Ã ½ÇÇö°¡´É¼º ºÐ¼®: ¼­¿ïƯº°½Ã Á¶·Ê ºÐ¼®À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î
Feasibility of Age Friendly City : Focused on the analysis of the Ordinance of Welfare for the Older Adult in Seoul

³ëÀκ¹Áö¿¬±¸ 2014³â 65±Ç 1È£ p.109 ~ p.130

Á¤¼øµÑ(Chung Soon-Dool) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ »çȸº¹ÁöÇаú
À±Èñ¼ö(Youn Hee-Soo) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ »çȸº¹ÁöÀü¹®´ëÇпø

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ¼­¿ï½ÃÀÇ WHO °í·Éģȭµµ½Ã ½ÇÇö°¡´É¼ºÀ» ¼­¿ï½Ã Á¶·ÊºÐ¼®À» ÅëÇØ Å½»öÇØ º¸´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. WHO(2007)´Â °í·Éģȭµµ½ÃÀÇ ½ÇÇöÀ» À§ÇØ °í·Éģȭµµ½Ã °¡À̵å(Global Age-friendly Cities: A Guide)¸¦ ¸¸µé¾î ÁöħÀ» Á¦°øÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â WHOÀÇ °í·Éģȭµµ½Ã °¡À̵带 Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ¼­¿ï½Ã°¡ °í·Éģȭµµ½ÃÀÇ ½ÇÇöÀ» À§ÇØ Á¦Á¤ÇÑ ¡®¼­¿ïƯº°½Ã °í·Éģȭµµ½Ã ±¸ÇöÀ» À§ÇÑ ³ëÀκ¹Áö ±âº»Á¶·Ê¡¯ÀÇ Á¦2Àå Àüü¿Í Á¦3ÀåÀÇ ÀϺθ¦ ºñ±³¤ýºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °ËÅä ¹× Æò°¡´Â ³ëÀκ¹Áö Àü¹®°¡ 1Àΰú ¿¬±¸ÀÚ 1Àο¡ ÀÇÇØ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. ºÐ¼®°á°ú, ¼­¿ï½Ã Á¶·Ê´Â WHOÀÇ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎ 8°³ ¿µ¿ªÀ» ¸ðµÎ¸¦ ¹Ý¿µÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸³ª, ½ÇÇö°¡´É¼ºÀ» ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀ¸·Î Á¦½ÃÇÏÁö´Â ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Á¶·ÊÀÇ ¼º°Ý»ó Á¶·Ê´Â ±ÔÄ¢À̳ª ¸í·É µî°ú °°ÀÌ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ¹æÇâÀ» Á¦½ÃÇØ¾ß ÇÏÁö¸¸ Çö ¼­¿ï½ÃÀÇ Á¶·Ê´Â Ãß»óÀûÀÎ ¹üÀ§¿¡¼­ WHOÀÇ °¡À̵å¶óÀÎÀ» Æ÷°ýÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â ¼öÁØÀ¸·Î¸¸ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Áï, °í·Éģȭµµ½Ã ±¸ÇöÀ» À§ÇÑ ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ »çÇ×Àº Á¦½ÃÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÌ¿Í °°Àº ºÐ¼®°á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇâÈÄ À̸¦ º¸¿Ï ¹× ¹ßÀü½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±¸Ã¼ÀûÀÎ ¹æ¾ÈÀ» Á¦½ÃÇØ º¸¾Ò´Ù.
The purpose of this study is to explore the feasibility of WHO¡¯s age-friendly city by analyzing the Ordinance of Welfare for the Older Adult in Seoul, which is made for actualizing age-friendly city Seoul. WHO(2007) provides a guideline of global age-friendly city. All Chapter 2 and part of Chapter 3 of the Ordinance of Welfare for the Older Adult in Seoul were analyzed and compared based on the WHO¡¯s guideline. Evaluation and analysis were conducted and implemented by a specialist for elderly welfare and a researcher. Results revealed that although Seoul¡¯s Ordinance reflects all 8 domains of WHO¡¯s guideline, it did not show the feasibility concretely. Although the Ordinance should provide concrete directions like rules and orders, the Ordinance of Seoul just covers content of WHO¡¯s guideline in an abstract level. That is, the Ordinance does not provide specific items in order to actualize an age-friendly city Seoul. Based on the results, detailed countermeasures for developing and supplementing plan of an age friendly city Seoul were discussed.

Å°¿öµå

°í·Éģȭµµ½Ã, È°µ¿Àû ³ëÈ­, ¼­¿ï½Ã Á¶·ÊºÐ¼®
age friendly city, Seoul, active aging, analysis of the Ordinance
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå