Coffee Enema for Preparation for Small Bowel Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Pilot Study

Clinical Nutrition Research 2014³â 3±Ç 2È£ p.134 ~ p.141

±èÀº¼±(Kim Eun-Sun) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
ÀüÈÆÀç(Chun Hoon-Jai) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
±Ýº¸¶ó(Keum Bo-Ra) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
¼­¿¬¼®(Seo Yeon-Seok) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
ÁøÀ±ÅÂ(Jeen Yoon-Tae) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
ÀÌÈ«½Ä(Lee Hong-Sik) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
¾ö¼øÈ£(Um Soon-Ho) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
±èâ´ö(Kim Chang-Duck) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
·ùÈ£»ó(Ryu Ho-Sang) - Korea University College of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Coffee enemas are believed to cause dilatation of bile ducts and excretion of bile through the colon wall. Proponents of coffee enemas claim that the cafestol palmitate in coffee enhances the activity of glutathione S-transferase, an enzyme that stimulates bile excretion. During video capsule endoscopy (VCE), excreted bile is one of the causes of poor preparation of the small bowel. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effect of coffee enema for preparation of the small bowel during VCE. In this pilot study, 17 of 34 patients were assigned to the coffee enema plus polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2 L ingestion group, whereas the 17 remaining control patients received 2 L of PEG only. The quality of bowel preparation was evaluated in the two patient groups. Bowel preparations in the proximal segments of small bowel were not differ between two groups. In the mid and distal segments of the small intestine, bowel preparations tend to be better in patients who received coffee enemas plus PEG than in patients who received PEG only. The coffee enema group did not experience any complications or side effects. Coffee enemas may be a feasible option, and there were no clinically significant adverse events related to coffee enemas. More prospective randomized studies are warranted to improve small bowel preparation for VCE.

Å°¿öµå

Coffee, Enema, Polyethylene glycol, Small bowel preparation, Video capsule endoscopy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Bowel preparations in the proximal segments of small bowel were not differ between two groups. In the mid and distal segments of the small intestine, bowel preparations tend to be better in patients who received coffee enemas plus PEG than in patients who received PEG only.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå