Zen and the Art of ICD Rhythm Discrimination

International Journal of Arrhythmia 2011³â 12±Ç 4È£ p.16 ~ p.23

(Ostrow Eliot L.) - St. Jude Medical
·ù°æ¹«(Ryu Kyung-Moo) - ¼¼ÀÎÆ®Áêµå¸ÞµðÄ®

Abstract

Today¡¯s implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are sophisticated systems that are equipped with a variety of features and algorithms that discriminate between the rhythms that the device will treat and those it will ignore. As ICD systems have evolved and the indications for their implantation have expanded, clinicians are now faced with decisions that go beyond the application of the technology to distinguish between ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, as they must now consider questions of a more philosophical nature, such as when therapy is truly necessary. Future technological developments are likely, and while they may provide users with additional tools, they may also raise new questions about their appropriate applications.

Å°¿öµå

discrimination, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Today's¡¯ ICDs provide a wide range of programmable parameters and sophisticated algorithms that effectively discriminate between VT/VF and SVT.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå