Comparison of Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Myolysis (LRFM) and Ultrasonographic Radiofrequency Myolysis (URFM) in Treatment of Midline Dysmenorrhea
´ëÇÑÆó°æÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 20±Ç 2È£ p.75 ~ p.79
Á¶Àº¾Æ(Cho Eun-A) - Honam University Department of Nursing
¾ö¹ÌÁ¤(Um Mi-Jung) - Chosun University College of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
±è¼ö¾Æ(Kim Soo-Ah) - Chosun University College of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
±è¼÷Áø(Kim Suk-Jin) - Chosun University College of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Á¤Çõ(Jung Hyuk) - Chosun University College of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract
Objective: To access the effectiveness of radiofrequency myolysis (RFM) in women with midline dysmenorrhea.
Methods: We designed RFM in two ways laparoscopic RFM (LRFM), vaginal ultrasound-guided RFM (URFM). One hundred and thirty-two patients were in the LRFM group and, 140 patients were in the URFM group.
Results: Upon receipt of surgery, both the LRFM and the URFM groups demonstrated a significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the mean pain score when compared to those before and after surgery.
Conclusion: The RF uterine myolysis procedure provides an alternative for those patients who suffer from intractable midline dysmenorrhea. LRFM is an alternative choice because it is relatively safe and, simple to perform and moreover, it is satisfactory. LRFM appears to increasingly succeed in the treatment of midline dysmenorrhea.
Å°¿öµå
Dysmenorrhea, Laparoscopy, Leiomyoma, Radiofrequency myolysis, Ultrasonography
KMID :
1007320140200020075
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)