Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer in Elderly and Non-elderly Patients: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Cancer Research and Treatment 2017³â 49±Ç 1È£ p.263 ~ p.273

À强ȯ(Chang Seong-Hwan) - Konkuk University School of Medicine Department of Surgery
±è¼ö³ç(Kim Soo-Nyung) - Konkuk University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
ÃÖÇýÁ¤(Choi Hye-Jung) - Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
¹Ú¹Ì¼÷(Park Mi-Suk) - Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine Institute of Health Science
±è·Ï¹ü(Kim Rock-Bum) - Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health
°í¼¼ÀÏ(Go Se-Il) - Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine
ÀÌ¿ø¼·(Lee Won-Sup) - Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy on elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) using meta-analysis of well-designed randomized controlled clinical studies.

Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched to retrieve clinical studies evaluating the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy in the elderly with AGC. Hazards ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled across studies using a fixed-effects model.

Results: Two studies were included in this meta-analysis to estimate HR for the overall survival (OS), and relapse-free survival (RFS) between adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery in elderly and non-elderly patients. HR for OS in the elderly and non-elderly was 0.745 (95% CI, 0.552 to 1.006, p=0.055) and 0.636 (95% CI, 0.522 to 0.776; p < 0.001), respectively, which showed no heterogeneity regarding HR between the two groups (pinteraction=0.389). HR for RFS in the elderly and non-elderly was 0.613 (95% CI, 0.466 to 0.806; p < 0.001) and 0.633 (95% CI, 0.533 to 0.753; p < 0.001), respectively (pinteraction=0.846).

Conclusion: Meta-analysis suggests that the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy to the elderly is not big enough to reach statistical significance while the HR for OS is less than 1 (0.745) and no heterogeneity are observed regarding the HR between the elderly and non-elderly patients.

Å°¿öµå

Adjuvant chemotherapy, Aged, Stomach neoplasms, Meta-analysis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy to the elderly is still statistically insignificant, even though there was no statistically significant heterogeneity regarding HR between the elderly and non-elderly patients.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå