Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III Trial of Heptaplatin 1-hour Infusion and 5-Fluorouracil CombinationChemotherapy Comparing with Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients withAdvanced Gastric Cancer

Cancer Research and Treatment 2009³â 41±Ç 1È£ p.12 ~ p.18

ÀÌ°æÈñ(Lee Kyoung-Hee) - ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÁøÁ¾À²(Jin Jong-Youl) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼º°¡º´¿ø Ç÷¾×³»°ú
Çö¸í¼ö(Hyun Myung-Soo) - ¿µ³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓâ¿­(Yim Chang-Yeol) - ÀüºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
À̼ø³²(Lee Soon-Nam) - ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓÈ£¿µ(Lim Ho-Yeong) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø Ç÷¾×Á¾¾ç³»°ú
¹ÚÈñ¼÷(Park Hee-Sook) - ¼øõÇâ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
·ùÇå¸ð(Ryoo Hun-Mo) - ´ë±¸°¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁؼ®(Kim Jun-Suk) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸·Îº´¿ø ³»°ú
¼ÕâÇÐ(Sohn Chang-Hak) - ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ºÎ»ê¹éº´¿ø Ç÷¾×Á¾¾ç³»°ú
±èÈƱ³(Kim Hoon-Kyo) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼ººó¼¾Æ®º´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¾çÁø¸ð(Yang Jin-Mo) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
Á¤ÁÖ¼·(Chung Joo-Seop) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
µµ¿µ·Ï(Do Young-Rok) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ µ¿»êÀÇ·á¿ø ³»°ú
¼ÛÈ«¼÷(Song Hong-Suk) - °è¸í´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ µ¿»êÀÇ·á¿ø ³»°ú
ÁøÇü¹Î(Jin Hyung-Min) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼ººó¼¾Æ®º´¿ø ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Purpose:Heptaplatin (Sunpla) is a cisplatin derivative. A phase IIb trial using heptaplatin resulted in a34% response rate with mild nephrotoxicity. We conducted a randomized phase III trial ofheptaplatin plus 5-FU compared with cisplatin plus 5-FU in patients with advanced gastriccancer.

Materials and Methods:One hundred seventy-four patients (heptaplatin, n=88; cisplatin, n=86) from 13 centers wereenrolled. The eligibility criteria were as follows: patients with pathologically-provenadenocarcinoma, chemonaive patients, or patients who had received only single adjuvantchemotherapy, and who had a measurable or evaluable lesion. On day 1, heptaplatin (400mg/m2) or cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was given over 1 hour with 5-FU (1 gm/m2) on days 1¡­5 every 4weeks.

Results:At the time of survival analysis, the median overall survival was 7.3 months in the 5-FU +heptaplatin (FH) arm and 7.9 months in the 5-FU + cisplatin (FP) arm (p=0.24). Of the FHpatients, 34.2% (complete response [CR], 1.3%; partial response [PR], 32.9%) experienced aconfirmed objective response compared with 35.9% (CR 0%, PR 35.9%) of FP patients(p=0.78). The median-time-to-progression was 2.5 months in the FH arm and 2.3 months in theFP arm. The incidence of neutropenia was higher with FP (28%) than with FH (16%; p=0.06);grade 3¡­4 nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the FP than in the FH arm (p=0.01 andp=0.05, respectively). The incidence of increased proteinuria and creatininemia was higherwith FH than with FP; however, there was no statistical difference. There were no treatment-related deaths.

Conclusion:Heptaplatin showed similar effects to cisplatin when combined with 5-FU in advanced gastriccancer patients with tolerable toxicities.

Å°¿öµå

Combination chemotherapy, Advanced gastric cancer, Heptaplatin
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Heptaplatin showed similar effects to cisplatin when combined with 5-FU in advanced gastric cancer patients with tolerable toxicities.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå