Á÷Àå ½Å°æ³»ºÐºñÁ¾¾çÀÇ Áø´Ü°ú Ä¡·á
Diagnosis and Treatment of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumor

´ëÇѳ»°úÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 87±Ç 4È£ p.415 ~ p.423

½ÅÇö´ö(Shin Hyun-Deok) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are not uncommon. Recently, the incidence of rectal NETs has increased markedly due to the widespread use of screening colonoscopy. Most rectal NETs detected incidentally are asymptomatic and at an early stage at diagnosis. Typical NETs < 10 mm in size and confined to the submucosal layer can be resected completely using various endoscopic treatments. These NETs have a good prognosis. However, not all NETs necessarily have good prognoses; those > 10 mm in size, with ulceration or depression, muscularis invasion seen on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), lymphovascular invasion, or a high mitotic index histologically are associated with metastasis. Generally, NETs < 10 mm can be treated endoscopically, while those > 20 mm should be resected surgically. The treatment of NETs between 10 and 20 mm is controversial. For these, it is necessary to choose an effective, safe primary resection method to ensure complete resection and to perform a careful histological examination of the resected tissue.

Ű¿öµå

Rectum, Neuroendocrine tumor, Endoscopic treatment, Prognosis
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå