¼öÁö ÁßÀ§Áö°ñ ±ÙÀ§ Áö°üÀý³» Àü¹æ °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹¼ú ¹× ³»°íÁ¤¼ú
Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Intraarticular Volar Fractures of the Middle Phalanx in Proximal Interphalangeal Joint

´ëÇѼöºÎ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 19±Ç 3È£ p.116 ~ p.123

ÀÌÈ£Àç(Lee Ho-Jae) - Â÷ÀǰúÇдëÇб³ ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁøÇö(Lee Jin-Hyun) - Â÷ÀǰúÇдëÇб³ ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ºÀ¼±ÅÂ(Bong Sun-Tae) - Â÷ÀǰúÇдëÇб³ ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿ìÇö(Kim Woo-Hyun) - Â÷ÀǰúÇдëÇб³ ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÇѼöÈ«(Han Soo-Hong) - Â÷ÀǰúÇдëÇб³ ºÐ´çÂ÷º´¿ø Á¤Çü¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ±Þ¼º ÁßÀ§Áö°ñ ±âÀúºÎ °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹ ¹× ³»°íÁ¤¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ÈÄ ÀÓ»óÀû°ú ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû °á°ú¸¦ º¸°íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

¹æ¹ý: ¼öÁö ÁßÀ§Áö°ñ ±âÀúºÎÀÇ ±Þ¼º °üÀý³» °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇØ ³ª»ç¸ø°ú ¼ÒÇü±Ý¼ÓÆÇÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ³»°íÁ¤¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ 11¸íÀ» ´ë»ó
À¸·Î ÈÄÇâÀû ¿¬±¸¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³»°íÁ¤ÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ ½ÉÇÑ ºÐ¼â °ñÀýÀ̳ª, °³¹æ¼º °ñÀý, ¿¬ºÎÁ¶Á÷ ¼Õ»óÀÌ µ¿¹ÝµÈ °æ¿ì µîÀº Á¦¿ÜÇÏ¿´´Ù. ³²ÀÚ 9¸í, ¿©ÀÚ 2¸íÀ̾ú°í Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 43.7¼¼, Æò±Õ Ã߽à ±â°£Àº 15.2°³¿ùÀ̾ú´Ù. Ã߽à ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø¿¡¼­ °ñÀ¯ÇÕ°ú °üÀý¸éÀÇ º¯È­ µîÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´°í, °üÀý¿îµ¿ ¹üÀ§ ¹× disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH) Á¡¼ö µîÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±â´ÉÀû °á°ú¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ¼ö»ó ¼öÁö´Â ¼ÒÁö°¡ 4¿¹, ¾àÁö ¹× ÁßÁö°¡ °¢°¢ 3¿¹, ÀÎÁö°¡ 1¿¹¿´´Ù. ÀÌ Áß 7¿¹¿¡¼­´Â ¼ÒÇü ±Ý¼ÓÆÇ°ú ³ª»ç¸øÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ °íÁ¤À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´°í 4¿¹¿¡¼­´Â ³ª»ç¸ø¸¸À¸·Î °íÁ¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÖÁ¾ Ã߽à °üÂû ½Ã ±ÙÀ§ Áö°üÀýÀÇ Æò±Õ ¿îµ¿¹üÀ§´Â 95??, total active range of motionÀº 243.2??, Æò±Õ DASH Á¡¼ö´Â 7.4Á¡À̾ú´Ù. ¸ðµç °ñÀý¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼± »çÁø»ó °ñÀ¯ÇÕ±îÁö Æò±Õ 2.8°³¿ùÀÌ ¼Ò¿äµÇ¾ú°í, °üÀýÀÇ ÅðÇ༺ º¯È­¸¦ º¸ÀÎ ¿¹´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­ÀÇ ºÐ¼® °á°ú¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ¼öÁö ÁßÀ§Áö°ñ ±âÀúºÎÀÇ ±Þ¼º °üÀý³» °ñÀý¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹ ¹× ³»°íÁ¤¼úÀº 40% ÀÌ»óÀÇ °üÀý¸éÀ» ħ¹üÇÏ¿© ºÒ¾ÈÁ¤ÇÑ ±ÙÀ§ Áö°üÀýÀÇ ¹èÃø ¾ÆÅ»±¸°¡ µ¿¹ÝµÇ¾î ÀÖÁö¸¸ °üÀý¸éÀÇ °ñÀýÆíÀº 2°³ ÀÌÇÏÀ̸ç ÁßÀ§Áö ±âÀúºÎ ÁÖÀ§ ¹èºÎ ÇÇÁú°ñÀº ¼Õ»ó ¹ÞÁö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì·Î ³»°íÁ¤ÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼ö¼úÀû Ä¡·á¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ÃßõÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Ä¡·á¹ýÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù.
Purpose: We report clinical and radiographic outcomes after internal fixation of intraarticular volar fractures of the middle phalanx base.

Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 11 patients who had been treated with miniplate or screw for acute proximal interphalangeal joint fracture, after adjusting for the cases excluding severe comminuted or open fractures. The participants consisted of 9 males and 2 females, with average age of 43.7 years and with average follow-up period of 15.2 months. Bony union, change of articular side were examined through radiographs, and functional results were evaluated by means of the total active range of motion (TAM) and the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand (DASH).

Results: Of 11 cases of a finger fracture, 7 cases were fixed by miniplate with screws and 4 cases by screws alone. At the final follow-up retrospection, the average range of proximal interphalangeal joint motion was 95¡Æ, the average TAM was 243.2¡Æ, and the average DASH score was 7.4. Average 2.8 months was spent from the finger fracture to bony union. There was no case of degenerative change.

Conclusion: Open reduction and internal fixation with screws for acute intraarticular fractures of the middle phalanx base showed favorable results in our study and it could be one of recommendable treatment options.

Ű¿öµå

±ÙÀ§Áö°üÀý, ÁßÀ§Áö°ñ ±âÀúºÎ °ñÀý, °üÇ÷Àû Á¤º¹ ¹× ³»°íÁ¤¼ú
Proximal interphalangeal joint, Midphalanx base fracture, Open reduction and internal fixation
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå