ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æ°Ë»ç Áø´ÜÀ²¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚ ºÐ¼® -¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼-
Analysis of the Factors that Affect the Diagnostic Yield of Capsule Endoscopy in Patients with Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding
´ëÇѼÒȱâÇÐȸÁö 2007³â 49±Ç 2È£ p.79 ~ p.84
À̹üÀç(Lee Beom-Jae) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
ÀüÈÆÀç(Chun Hoon-Jai) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
±¸ÀÚ¼³(Koo Ja-Seol) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
±Ýº¸¶ó(Keum Bo-Ra) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
¹Ú»óÈÆ(Park Sang-Hoon) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
±èµÎ¶û(Kim Du-Rang) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
±Ç¿ë´ë(Kwon Yong-Dae) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
±è¿ë½Ä(Kim Yong-Sik) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
ÁøÀ±ÅÂ(Jean Yoon-Tae) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
ÀÌÈ«½Ä(Lee Hong-Sik) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
¾ö¼øÈ£(Um Soon-Ho) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
ÀÌ»ó¿ì(Lee Sang-Woo) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
ÃÖÀçÇö(Choi Jai-Hyun) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
±èâ´ö(Kim Chang-Duck) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
·ùÈ£»ó(Ryu Ho-Sang) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç, ¼Òȱ⿬±¸¼Ò
Abstract
¸ñÀû: ¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷Àº ´ëºÎºÐ ¼ÒÀå º´º¯À¸·Î Àüü À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷ÀÇ 5-10%¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÑ´Ù. ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æÀº ¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷À» ºñ·ÔÇÑ ¼ÒÀåÁúȯÀÇ Áø´Ü¿¡ ¸Å¿ì À¯¿ëÇÑ Áø´Ü ¹æ¹ýÀ¸·Î ±âÁ¸ °Ë»ç¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ôÀº Áø´ÜÀ²À» º¸°íÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù. À̹ø ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ Áø´ÜÀ²¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ÀÎÀÚ¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æ ½ÃÇà¿¡¼ ¼¼ºÐÈµÈ ÀûÀÀÁõÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó ¹× ¹æ¹ý: 2002³â 9¿ùºÎÅÍ 2004³â 9¿ù±îÁö ¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷À» ÁÖ¼Ò·Î °í·Á´ëÇб³ ¾È¾Ïº´¿ø¿¡ ³»¿øÇÏ¿© ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æ °Ë»ç¸¦ ½ÃÇà¹ÞÀº 116¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÈÄÇâ ¿¬±¸¸¦ ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æ ¼Ò°ß¿¡ µû¶ó ºñÁ¤»ó±º°ú Á¤»ó±ºÀ¸·Î ȯÀÚ¸¦ ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿© ÀÓ»ó Ư¼º, °Ë»ç ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Áø´ÜÀ² Â÷À̸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æ Áø´ÜÀ²Àº 69%¿´°í, ºñ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å Ç׿°Áõ ¾à¹°¿¡ À¯¹ßµÈ ±Ë¾ç º´º¯ÀÌ 19¿¹, Ç÷°üÇü¼ºÀÌ»óÀÌ 15¿¹·Î °¡Àå ÈçÇÑ ¼Ò°ßÀ̾ú´Ù. ´Üº¯·® ºÐ¼® ¹× ´Ùº¯·® ºÐ¼®¿¡¼ È°µ¿ ÃâÇ÷ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô Áø´ÜÀ» ¿¹ÃøÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÀÎÀÚ¿´´Ù(p£¼0.05).
°á·Ð: ¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷À» Áø´ÜÇÒ ¶§ ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æÀÇ Áø´ÜÀ²Àº 69%¿´À¸¸ç, Çö¼º ÃâÇ÷ ȯÀÚ±º¿¡¼ Áø´ÜÀ²ÀÌ À¯ÀÇÀÖ°Ô ³ô¾Ò´Ù. ¹Ýº¹ÀûÀÎ °Ë»ç¿¡ µû¸¥ ºÒÆí°¨ µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§, ĸ¼ú³»½Ã°æÀÇ ½ÃÇà ½Ã±â¿Í ´ë»óÀº Ç÷º¯ ¹× Èæ»öº¯ÀÇ Áõ»óÀÌ Àִ ȯÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ½ÃÇàÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¿ì¼±ÀûÀ¸·Î °í·ÁÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
Background/Aims: Capsule endoscopy (CE) has become a valuable modality for the detection of small bowel lesions. The usefulness of CE for obscure gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding has been established with an overall diagnostic yield of 60%. It is unknown whether CE is of equal value in all the patients or of greater benefit in selected groups in Korea. We evaluated the factors that affect the diagnostic yields of CE in patients with obscure GI bleeding.
Methods: CE was performed in 126 consecutive patients [74 men and 52 women mean age£º52.5 years (25-75 yrs), 23 with active bleeding] with obscure GI bleeding between September 2002 and July 2004. Patients were divided into two groups: those with documented bleeding lesions and those with non specific CE findings. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and other parameters that influenced the diagnostic yields of CE.
Results: A definite or probable cause for obscure GI bleeding was found in 69% (80/116) of the patients. NSAID induced ulcer (16.4%) and angiodysplasia (12.1%) were the most common diagnoses. In patients with active bleeding, the diagnostic yield was significantly greater than that of the patients with occult bleeding (80% vs. 68.3%, p£¼0.05). However, there was no significant difference in parameters between patients with abnormal CE and those with normal CE in respect to gender, age, previous bleeding history, need for transfusion, cecum imaging, and bowel preparation.
Conclusion: The diagnostic yield of CE in patients with obscure GI bleeding is 69%. It is significantly higher in patients with active bleeding. (Korean J Gastroenterol 2007;49:79-84)
Å°¿öµå
¿øÀÎ ºÒ¸íÀÇ À§Àå°üÃâÇ÷, ĸ½¶³»½Ã°æ, Áø´ÜÀ²
Capsule endoscopy, Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding, Diagnostic yield
KMID :
0614620070490020079
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
There was no significant difference in parameters between patients with abnormal CE and those with normal CE in respect to gender, age, previous bleeding history, need for transfusion, cecum imaging, and bowel preparation.