ÁÖ¿ä±¹ÀÇ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ°Ë»ç ½ÃÇàÇöȲ°ú Áú È®º¸¹æ¾È
Health Insurance Benefit Criteria and Quality Assurance Policies of Diagnostic Ultrasound Services in Other Countries
º¸°ÇÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 24±Ç 2È£ p.109 ~ p.119
Á¤¼³Èñ(Chung Seol-Hee) - °Ç°º¸Çè½É»çÆò°¡¿ø ½É»çÆò°¡¿¬±¸¼Ò
ÀÌÇýÁø(Lee Hye-Jin) - °Ç°º¸Çè½É»çÆò°¡¿ø ½É»çÆò°¡¿¬±¸¼Ò
±èÇÑ»ó(Kim Han-Sang) - °Ç°º¸Çè½É»çÆò°¡¿ø ½É»çÆò°¡¿¬±¸¼Ò
¿ÀÁÖ¿¬(Oh Ju-Yeon) - °Ç°º¸Çè½É»çÆò°¡¿ø ½É»çÆò°¡¿¬±¸¼Ò
Abstract
In accordance with the government¡¯s plan to expand the national health insurance (NHI) coverage for severe diseases such as cancer, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, and rare and incurable disease, the diagnostic ultrasound services have been covered by NHI from October 1, 2013. The quality is very important factor in providing diagnostic services because they influence on the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of diseases. In particular, equipments and health care providers plays an important role in providing qualitative services. The purpose of this paper is to examine the major feature of ultrasound services covered by health security system and to review quality assurance policies in other countries such as Australia, Japan, the USA, and Canada. In addition, we assessed the implication of those policies. We especially put emphasis on the types and qualifications of healthcare professionals and measures to manage equipments. All countries have reviewed on policies to promote the quality such as educational requirements of professionals or restrictions on the duration of equipment usage. Various measures should be implemented to assure the qualitative ultrasound service.
Ű¿öµå
National health insurance, Benefit criteria, Healthcare quality assurance, Ultrasonic diagnosis
KMID :
0387320140240020109
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)