À§¾Ï ȯÀÚ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¤±Ô À§ ÀýÁ¦¼ú¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ºñÀ§°ü ¹è¾×¼úÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀüÇâÀûÀÎ ¿¬±¸
Usefulness of Nasogastric Decompression Following Elective Gastric Cancer Surgery A Randomized Prospective Study

´ëÇÑ¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 62±Ç 1È£ p.52 ~ p.56

ÀÌÅÂÀÏ(Lee Tae-Eel) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓµ¿Ç¥(Lim Dong-Pyo) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
·ù¼º¿±(Ryu Seong-Yeop) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±èµ¿ÀÇ(Kim Dong-Yi) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿µÁø(Kim Young-Jin) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è½Å°ï(Kim Shin-Kon) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Purpose : Traditionally, nasogastric decompression has been a routine procedure following major abdominal surgery or gastrointestinal surgery. This prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed in order to evaluate the usefulness
of
nasogastric decompression following elective gastric cancer surgery.
Methods : This study was carried out prospectively. A total of 95 patients were randomly divided into two groups, group ¥° (45 patients with nasogatric tube) and group ¥± (50 patients without nasogastric tube). Patients receiving emergency
surgery due to gastric outlet obstruction were excluded from this study. The data was analysed by chi-square test, T-test and Mann-Whitney U test with the level of significance set at P<0.05.
Results : No significant differences were found between the two groups in regards to nausea, vomting, distension, anastomotic leak or wound dehiscence. However, longer hospital stay, delayed passage of flatus, delayed initiation of
ambulation,
delayed start of feeding and sore throat occurred more often in group ¥° patients than in group ¥± patients.
Conclusion : The result showed that the routine prophylactic use of nasogastric decompression following gastric cancer surgery is an unnecessary procedure and does not offer any considerable advantage.

Å°¿öµå

ºñÀ§°ü ¹è¾×¼ú, À§¾Ï ÀýÁ¦¼ú, Nasogastric decompression, Gastric cancer surgery,
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
The result showed that the routine prophylactic use of nasogastric decompression following gastric cancer surgery is an unnecessary procedure and does not offer any considerable advantage.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå