ü³»Á¦¼¼µ¿±â ÀÌ½Ä ½ÃÀÇ »ç¸Á·üºÐ¼®
Mortality Analysis of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
º¸ÇèÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2011³â 30±Ç 2È£ p.12 ~ p.15
¹Ú±¤ÀÏ(Park Kwang-Il) - ÄÚ¸®¾È¸® »ý¸íºÎ
Abstract
Background: The beneficial effects of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) in primary and secondary prevention patients are well established. However, data on potential differences between both groups in mortality are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess extra risk differences between primary and secondary prevention ICD recipients.
Methods: Comparative mortality figures were calculated from a source article using mortality analysis methods.
Results: Mortality ratio (MR) of primary and secondary prevention ICD recipients were 393% and 373%. Excess death rates (EDR) of both groups were 42 and 38 per 1,000.
Discussion: MR and EDR were higher in primary prevention group. But, there was no significant difference.
Å°¿öµå
MR, mortality ratio, EDR, excess death rate, ICD, implantable cardioverter defibrillator
KMID :
0365420110300020012
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Mortality ratio (MR) of primary and secondary prevention ICD recipients were 393% and 373%; MR and EDR were higher in primary prevention group. But, there was no significant difference.