Long-Term Outcome of Low-Energy Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Comparative Analysis According to Ultrasonographic Findings
´ëÇÑÀçÈ°ÀÇÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 38±Ç 4È£ p.534 ~ p.540
¹ÚÁ¤¿Ï(Park Jong-Wan) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
À±°æÀç(Yoon Kyung-Jae) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
õ±¤¼ö(Chun Kwang-Soo) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
ÀÌÁØ¿¬(Lee Joon-Youn) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
¹ÚÈñÁø(Park Hee-Jin) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Radiology
À̼ҿ¬(Lee So-Yeon) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Radiology
ÀÌ¿ëÅÃ(Lee Yong-Taek) - Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine Kangbuk Samsung Hospital Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the long-term effect of low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for plantar fasciitis (PF) according to ultrasonography (US) findings.
Methods: Thirty feet of 25 patients with clinical diagnosis of PF were enrolled and divided into two groups (Apparent-US and Uncertain-US) according to US findings, such as plantar fascia thickening or hypoechogenicity. Inclusion criteria were symptom duration >6 months and a fair or poor grade in Roles-Maudsley score (RMS). ESWT (0.10 mJ/mm2, 600 shocks) was given once a week for 6 weeks. Numeric rating scale (NRS) and RMS were evaluated prior to each ESWT session, at short-term follow-up (one week after all ESWT sessions) and long-term follow-up telephone interview (mean 24 months after ESWT). Good and excellent grade in RMS were considered as treatment success.
Results: Repeated measure ANOVA demonstrated that NRS significantly decreased with time after ESWT up to the long-term follow-up (time effect, p<0.001) without group-time interaction (p=0.641), indicating that ESWT equally decreased pain in both groups. Overall success rate was 63.3% (short-term follow-up) and 80.0% (long-term follow-up). In comparative analysis between groups, success rate of Apparent-US and Uncertain-US at short-term follow-up was 61.9% and 66.7%, respectively, and 85.7% and 66.7%, respectively, at long-term follow-up.
Conclusion: If other causes of heel pain are ruled out through meticulous physical examination and ultrasonography, low-energy ESWT in PF seems to be beneficial regardless of US findings. In terms of success rate, however, long-term outcome of Apparent-US appears to be superior to Uncertain-US.
Å°¿öµå
Plantar fasciitis, Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), Ultrasonography, Treatment outcome
KMID :
0361420140380040534
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)