¿ä°ñµÎ¾ÆÅ»±¸ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¹æ»ç¼± °Ë»ç ½ÃÇà°ú ¿¬°üµÈ ÀÎÀÚ ºÐ¼®
Factors Associated with Radiologic Tests in Patients with Radial Head Subluxation

´ëÇѿܻóÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.13 ~ p.19

ÀåÀÍ¿Ï(Chang Ik-Wan) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇб³½Ç
±èµµ±Õ(Kim Do-Kyun) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¼Ò¿µ(Park So-Young) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇб³½Ç
¼­µ¿¹ü(Suh Dong-Bum) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇб³½Ç
Á¤ÀçÀ±(Jung Jae-Yun) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇб³½Ç
°û¿µÈ£(Kwak Young-Ho) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÀÀ±ÞÀÇÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Purpose: In general, X-ray examinations are not recommended for radial head subluxation (pulled elbow) patients. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of X-ray examinations and to investigate the factors associated with the decision to perform an X-ray examination on a patient with a pulled elbow.

Methods: Patients who visited the pediatric emergency department (ED) of one tertiary hospital from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2012, with a diagnosis of radial head subluxation at discharge were enrolled in this study. Through retrospective chart reviews, factors that could have influenced the decision to perform an X-ray examination and their statistical relevance were analyzed.

Results: A total 308 patients were enrolled, and 101 patients (32.8%) underwent X-ray examinations. Among the 252 patients with a typical pulled elbow, 65 underwent X-ray examination. This result showed statistical significance compared to atypical pull-elbow group (25.8% vs. 64.3%, p<0.001). Factors associated with the decision to perform an X-ray examination were analyzed using the Chi-square test and the Fisher¡¯s exact test. The mechanism of injury and consultation with an orthopedic surgeon (p=0.001) showed statistical significance. In the multivariable logistic regression, the odds ratio (OR) for the injury mechanism was 4.7 (95% CI: 1.8~8.8, p<0.001) and that for consultation with an orthopedic surgeon was 8.0 (95% CI: 1.6~40.7, p=0.004).

Conclusion: One third of patients with a pulled elbow underwent X-ray examination, and patients with an atypical mechanism of injury underwent more frequent X-ray examinations than did patients with a typical mechanism of injury. The factors that could have influenced the decision to perform an X-ray examination were mechanism of injury and consultation with an orthopedic surgeon.

Ű¿öµå

Radius, X-ray, Child
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå