Àü¹æ±íÀÌ ¹× Àü¹æ°¢ ÃøÁ¤¿¡¼­ ¾ÉÀº ÀÚ¼¼·Î ÃÔ¿µµÈ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄ»ýüÇö¹Ì°æÀÇ À¯¿ë¼º
Clinical Usefulness of UBM in the Sitting Position in Anterior Chamber Depth and Angle Measurements

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 7È£ p.1007 ~ p.1016

±èűâ(Kim Tae-Gi) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¹®¼º¿î(Moon Sung-Woon) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¾çÁöÈ£(Yang Ji-Ho) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
Áø°æÇö(Jin Kyung-Hyun) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

Purpose: We compared the measurements of anterior chamber depth (ACD) and anterior chamber angle (ACA) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in the sitting position compared with IOL Master¢ç, Pentacam¢ç, and Spectralis optical coherence tomography (OCT) to evaluate the clinical usefulness of UBM in the sitting position.

Methods: We evaluated 92 eyes in 47 healthy adults. ACD was measured by IOL Master¢ç, Pentacam¢ç, and UBM. ACA was measured using Pentacam¢ç, UBM, and Spectralis OCT. UBM was performed in the sitting position using bag/balloon technology. Measured values were compared statistically.

Results: ACD measured by IOL Master¢ç, Pentacam¢ç, and UBM was 3.57 ¡¾ 0.32 ¥ìm, 3.64 ¡¾ 0.33 ¥ìm and 3.51 ¡¾ 0.32¥ìm, respectively. UBM measurements of ACD were significantly shallower than with the other methods (p < 0.001). The results among the 3 methods were strongly correlated (r > 0.8, p < 0.05 in all groups). Mean ACA of 4 directions was not significantly different among the 3 methods (p > 0.05). There was strong correlation between UBM and Spectralis OCT (r = 0.957) but moderate correlation between Pentacam¢ç and UBM and Pentacam¢ç and Spectralis OCT (r = 0.557, 0.571, respectively, p < 0.05). Specifically, ACA of the superior quadrant showed a low correlation between Pentacam¢ç and UBM and Pentacam¢ç and Spectralis OCT (r = 0.257, 0.295, respectively).

Conclusions: ACD measured by UBM in the sitting position was shallower compared to the other methods; however, ACD measured by IOL Master¢ç, Pentacam¢ç, and UBM showed significant correlations among the methods. The mean ACA measured by Pentacam¢ç, UBM, and Spectralis OCT showed no significant differences. Due to the high correlation of ACA measurements between UBM and Spectralis OCT in the present study, UBM is expected to be a good tool for measuring anterior segment parameters.

Ű¿öµå

Anterior chamber angle, Anterior chamber depth, Sitting position, UBM
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå