¿îµ¿ÃàÀ» »ðÀÔÇÑ ÇÏÀ̵å·Ï½Ã¾ÆÆÄŸÀÌÆ® ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹°¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¹æ¼±±ÕÁõ 2¿¹
Two Cases of Actinomyces Infection in a Hydroxyapatite Orbital Implant with a Motility Peg

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 5È£ p.755 ~ p.760

À̹αÔ(Lee Min-Gyu) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¿ì°æÀÎ(Woo Kyung-In) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
±èÀ±´ö(Kim Yoon-Duck) - ¼º±Õ°ü´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ¿îµ¿ÃàÀ» »ðÀÔÇÑ ÇÏÀ̵å·Ï½Ã¾ÆÆÄŸÀÌÆ® ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹°¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÑ ¹æ¼±±Õ °¨¿° 2¿¹¸¦ °æÇèÇÏ¿´±â¿¡ À̸¦ º¸°íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

Áõ·Ê¿ä¾à: 17³â Àü ÁÂ¾È ¾È±¸³»¿ëÁ¦°Å¼ú ¹× ÇÏÀ̵å·Ï½Ã¾ÆÆÄŸÀÌÆ® ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹° »ðÀÔ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹ÞÀº 44¼¼ ³²ÀÚ È¯ÀÚ¿Í 15³â Àü ÁÂ¾È ¾È±¸Á¦°Å¼ú ¹× ÇÏÀ̵å·Ï½Ã¾ÆÆÄŸÀÌÆ® ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹° »ðÀÔ¼úÀ» ¹ÞÀº 55¼¼ ³²ÀÚ È¯ÀÚ°¡ 1³â¿© ÀüºÎÅÍ °á¸·³¶¿¡ ÃâÇ÷ÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ°í »ìÀÌ Â÷¿À ¸£´Â Áõ»óÀ¸·Î ³»¿øÇÏ¿´´Ù. µÎ ȯÀÚ ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿îµ¿Ãà »ðÀÔ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹ÞÀº º´·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ³»¿ø ´ç½Ã °á¸·³¶¿¡ À°¾ÆÁ¾ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú°í À°¾ÆÁ¾ Á¦°Å ½Ã¿¡ ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹°ÀÌ ³ëÃâµÈ ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹° Á¦°Å¼ú ¹× ÀÚ°¡ ÁøÇÇÁö¹æ À̽ļúÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´°í Á¶Á÷º´ ¸®°Ë»ç °á°ú ¹æ¼±±Õ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹° °¨¿° ¼Ò°ßÀÌ È®ÀεǾú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ´Ù°ø¼º ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹°À» °¡Áø ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ °á¸·ÀÇ ¸¸¼º È­³ó¼º À°¾ÆÁ¾°ú ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹°ÀÇ ³ëÃâÀÌ Áö¼ÓµÇ´Â °æ¿ì, ¹æ¼±±Õ °¨¿°ÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ» °í·ÁÇÏ¿©¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ¹æ¼±±Õ °¨¿°Àº µå¹® °¨¿° ÁúȯÀ¸·Î, ÇÏÀ̵å·Ï½Ã¾ÆÆÄŸÀÌÆ® ¾È¿Í»ðÀÔ¹°¿¡¼­ÀÇ °¨¿°Àº ÇöÀç±îÁö ±¹³»¿¡ º¸°íµÈ ¿¹°¡ ¾ø¾î À̸¦ º¸°íÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ´Ù.
Purpose: To report 2 cases of Actinomyces infection in a hydroxyapatite orbital implant with a motility peg.

Case summary: A 44-year-old male and a 55-year-old male who underwent evisceration and implantation of a hydroxyapatite implant in the left eye 17 and 15 years prior, respectively, presented with a conjunctival sac granuloma with discharge and bleeding of 1 year duration. Both patients had a history of motility peg implantation. A large-area of the hydroxyapatite implant was exposed after removal of the granuloma. The previous orbital implant was removed, and the exposed area was covered with a dermis fat graft in both patients. On histopathological examination, Actinomyces infection in the orbital implant was observed in both patients.

Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of actinomycosis of hydroxyapatite orbital implant in Korea. In a patient with a porous orbital implant, the possibility of Actinomyces infection of the orbital implant should be considered after a long-duration and large-area exposure of the implant.

Ű¿öµå

Actinomyces, Hydroxyapatite, Motility peg, Orbital implant, Pyogenic granuloma
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå