ºÎºÐÁ¶Àý³»»ç½Ã ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿ø½Ã¾È°æ ±³Á¤ÀÇ º¯È
Changes in Hypermetropic Spectacle Correction after Surgery in Partially Accommodative Esotropia
´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 5È£ p.719 ~ p.725
¹è½Å¿ì(Bae Sin-Woo) - ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
±è¸ð¼¼(Kim Mo-Ses) - ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
Ãֹ̿µ(Choi Mi-Young) - ÃæºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
Abstract
¸ñÀû: ºÎºÐÁ¶Àý³»»ç½Ã ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ ³»»ç½Ã ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Á¤À§¸¦ À¯ÁöÇϱâ À§ÇØ ÇÊ¿äÇÑ ¿ø½Ã¾È°æ µµ¼ö º¯È ¾ç»óÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°í, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿ø½Ã¾È°æ À» ¹þÀ» ¼ö Àִ ȯÀÚÀÇ Æ¯Â¡À» ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: ºÎºÐÁ¶Àý³»»ç½Ã¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÀüÅëÀû ¹æ¹ý¿¡ ÁØÇÑ ³»»ç½Ã ±³Á¤ ¼ö¼úÀ» ¹ÞÀº 104¸í Áß ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 2³â ÀÌ»ó °æ°ú °üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇß´ø 64¸íÀ» ¼±Á¤ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿ø½Ã¾È°æÀ» ¹þÀº 28¸íÀ» ¾È°æÁߴܱº, ¿ø½Ã¾È°æÀÌ °è¼Ó ÇÊ¿äÇÑ 36¸íÀ» ¾È°æÀ¯Áö±ºÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇØ ÃÊÁø ½Ã¿Í ¼ö¼ú ½Ã ³ªÀÌ, ¼ö¼ú Àü Àüü ³»»ç½Ã°¢°ú ¿ø½Ã ±³Á¤ ÈÄ ÀÜ¿© ³»»ç½Ã°¢, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 1ÀÏ° »ç½Ã°¢, ¿ø½Ã¾È°æ µµ¼ö °¨·® ½Ã±â, °üÂû ±â°£À» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¾È°æÁߴܱº¿¡¼ ¾È°æÀ» ¹þÀº ½ÃÁ¡À» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ¾È°æÁߴܱº°ú ¾È°æÀ¯Áö±ºÀÇ ÃÊÁø ½Ã¿Í ¼ö¼ú ½Ã ³ªÀÌ, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 1ÀÏ° »ç½Ã°¢°ú °üÂû ±â°£Àº Åë°èÇÐÀû Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¾È°æ±³Á¤ Àü Àüü ³»»ç½Ã°¢Àº ¾È°æÁߴܱº¿¡¼ Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ÀÛ¾ÒÀ¸³ª(37.4PD:46.7PD, p£¼0.05), ¾È°æ ±³Á¤ ÈÄ ÀÜ¿© ³»»ç½Ã°¢Àº µÎ ±º °£ Â÷ÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ¾È°æÁߴܱºÀÇ ÃÊÁø ½Ã Æò±Õ ¾È°æµµ¼ö´Â 3.0D·Î ¾È°æÀ¯Áö±ºÀÇ 4.7Dº¸´Ù À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ÀÛ¾ÒÀ¸³ª(p£¼0.05), ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿ø½Ã¾È °æ °¨·® ½Ã±â´Â µÎ ±º °£ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù(18.8°³¿ù:27.5°³¿ù, p=0.14).
°á·Ð: ºÎºÐÁ¶Àý³»»ç½Ã ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¿ø½Ã¾È°æÀ» Áß´ÜÇÑ È¯ÀÚ±ºÀÌ ¿ø½Ã¾È°æÀÌ °è¼Ó ÇÊ¿äÇß´ø ȯÀÚ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ ¼ö¼ú Àü Æò±Õ ¾È°æµµ¼ö°¡ ³·°í, ¿ø½Ã¾È°æ ±³Á¤ Àü Àüü ³»»ç½Ã°¢ Å©±â°¡ ÀÛ¾Ò´Ù. µû¶ó¼, ºÎºÐÁ¶Àý³»»ç½Ã ȯÀÚ¿¡¼ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ ¾È°æ Áß´Ü ¿©ºÎ¸¦ ¿¹ÃøÇÏ´Â µ¥ µµ¿òÀÌ µÉ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ý°¢ÇÑ´Ù.
Purpose: To investigate the characteristics of successfully weaning patients off of glasses and the change in hypermetropic spectacle correction required for maintaining orthotropia using an analysis of surgery results of patients with partially accommodative esotropia.
Methods: We reviewed the medical records of 104 patients who underwent standard surgery for correcting partially accommodative esotropia. In total, 64 patients who had follow-up periods of at least 2 years were included. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 28 patients who were asked to discontinue their hyperopic glasses (glasses-discontinued group) and 36 patients who still needed hyperopic glasses (glasses-maintained group). We investigated the age at first visit and at surgery, total angle of deviation and residual angle of deviation with correction before surgery, weaning time of hyperopic glasses, follow-up period, and the time at which the hyperopic glasses were discontinued in the glasses-discontinued group.
Results: There were no statistically significant differences in the age at first visit and at surgery as well as the duration of postoperative follow-up between both groups. The total esodeviated angle without hyperopic correction of the glasses-discontinued group was significantly lower than that of glasses-maintained group (37.4PD:46.7PD, p < 0.05); there were no significant differences in the remaining esotropic angle after hyperopic correction. The average hyperopic degree in the glasses-discontinued group was significantly lower than that in the glasses-maintained group (+3.0D:+4.7D, p < 0.05), there were no significant differences in the weaning time of hyperopic glasses between both groups.
Conclusions: The esodeviated angle without hyperopic correction was smaller and hyperopic degree was lower in the glasses-discontinued group than in the glasses-maintained group after surgery for partially accommodative esotropia. Therefore, it might be helpful to predict the postoperative possibility to discontinue glasses in the patients with partially accommodative esotropia.
Å°¿öµå
Hypermetropia, Partially accommodative esotropia, Spectacles
KMID :
0360220140550050719
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)