ÁÁÀº ½Ã·ÂÀ» °¡Áø Ư¹ß¼º ¸Á¸·¾Õ¸·ÀÇ ¼ö¼ú°á°ú
Surgical Outcomes of Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane with Good Visual Acuity

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 5È£ p.686 ~ p.692

±è¼ºÀÏ(Kim Sung-Il) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°ú
¹Ú¼ºÈÄ(Park Sung-Who) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°ú
º¯Àͼö(Byon Ik-Soo) - ¾ç»êºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°ú
ÀÌÁöÀº(Lee Ji-Eun) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°ú

Abstract

¸ñÀû: Ư¹ß¼º ¸Á¸·¾Õ¸·ÀÇ Á¶±â ¼ö¼ú¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Å¸´ç¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸±â À§ÇØ ÁÁÀº ½Ã·ÂÀ» °¡Áø Ư¹ß¼º ¸Á¸·¾Õ¸· ȯÀÚÀÇ ¼ö¼ú°á°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æ º¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: Ư¹ß¼º ¸Á¸·¾Õ¸·À¸·Î À¯¸®Ã¼ÀýÁ¦¼ú°ú ¸·Á¦°Å¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹Þ°í 12°³¿ù ÀÌ»ó °æ°ú°üÂûÀÌ °¡´ÉÇÏ¿´´ø ȯÀÚ Áß ¼ö¼ú Àü ÃÖ´ë±³ Á¤½Ã·Â(logMAR)ÀÌ 0.3 ÀÌÇÏÀΠȯÀÚµéÀ» ÈÄÇâÀûÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àǹ«±â·Ï°ú ºû°£¼·´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ ¿µ»óÀ» ÅëÇØ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, º¯½ÃÁõ, Áß ½É¸Á¸·µÎ²², Á߽ɿÀ¸ñÇüÅÂ, ½Ã¼¼Æ÷ ³»Àý/¿ÜÀýÀÇ »óÅÂÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ´ë»óȯÀÚ´Â ÃÑ 24¸í, 24¾ÈÀ̾ú´Ù. Æò±ÕÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀº ¼ö¼ú Àü 0.26 ¡¾ 0.06¿¡¼­, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 12°³¿ù 0.25 ¡¾ 0.19·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ º¯È­´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. 2ÁÙ ÀÌ»óÀÇ ½Ã·Â È£Àü ¹× ÀúÇÏµÈ °æ¿ì´Â °¢°¢ 6¾È¾¿ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. º¯½ÃÁõÀ» È£¼ÒÇÑ 4¾ÈÀº ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 12°³¿ù±îÁö ¸ðµÎ Áõ»óÀÌ ³²¾Ò´Ù. Æò±Õ Á߽ɸÁ¸·µÎ²²´Â ¼ö¼ú Àü 418 ¡¾ 86 ¥ìm¿¡¼­, ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 6°³¿ù 334 ¡¾ 45 ¥ìm, 12°³¿ù 343 ¡¾ 45 ¥ìm·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù(p£¼0.01). Á߽ɿÀ¸ñÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´ø 17¾È Áß 11¾È(64.7%)¿¡¼­ Æò±Õ 6.6 ¡¾ 2.6°³¿ù µÚ¿¡ Á߽ɿÀ¸ñÀÌ È¸º¹µÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ½Ã¼¼Æ÷ ³»Àý/¿ÜÀýÀº ¼ö¼ú Àü Á¤»óÇü 19¾È, °¨¼âÇü 3¾È, ´ÜÀýÇü 2¾È¿¡¼­ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 12°³¿ù¿¡ Á¤»óÇü 20¾È, °¨¼âÇü 2¾È, ´ÜÀýÇü 2¾ÈÀ¸·Î ÀǹÌÀÖ´Â º¯È­´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

°á·Ð: ÁÁÀº ½Ã·ÂÀÇ Æ¯¹ß¼º ¸Á¸·¾Õ¸· ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¸·Á¦°Å¼úÀº Ȳ¹ÝºÎÀÇ ÇØºÎÇÐÀûÀΠȣÀüÀ» ¾òÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª ½Ã·ÂÀÇ È£ÀüÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀϺΠ¿¡¼­´Â ½Ã·ÂÀÌ ÀúÇϵǴ °æ¿ìµµ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸¹Ç·Î ÁÁÀº ½Ã·ÂÀ» °¡Áø Ư¹ß¼º ¸Á¸·¾Õ¸· ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ Á¶±â¼ö¼úÀº ½ÅÁßÈ÷ °áÁ¤ÇØ¾ß ÇϰڴÙ.
Purpose: To evaluate surgical outcomes of idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) with good visual acuity.

Methods: We evaluated patients who were diagnosed with idiopathic ERM with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) greater than 20/40 and who were followed-up for 12 months or longer after vitrectomy and membrane removal. BCVA, metamorphopsia, central subfield macular thickness (CSMT), foveal contour, and status of photoreceptor inner/outer segment (IS/OS) junction were retrospectively assessed based on the medical records and optical coherence tomography (OCT) images.

Results: Twenty-four eyes were included in the present study. The mean BCVA (log MAR) did not significantly improve from baseline to 12 months after surgery (0.26 ¡¾ 0.06 and 0.25 ¡¾ 0.19, respectively). Six eyes showed improved vision of two or more lines, and six eyes had decreased vision of two or more lines. Metamorphopsia remained in all four eyes with preoperative symptoms until 12 months postoperatively. CSMT decreased significantly from 418 ¡¾ 86 ¥ìm at baseline to 343 ¡¾ 45 ¥ìm at 12 months (p < 0.01). Among 17 eyes without foveal depression at baseline, 11 eyes recovered a foveal depression at an average of 6.6 months after surgery. IS/OS status at baseline was intact in 19 eyes, attenuated in three eyes, and disrupted in two eyes and did not change significantly at 12 months.

Conclusions: Surgical treatment for idiopathic ERM with good visual acuity resulted in anatomical but not functional improvement. Choosing surgery for idiopathic ERM with good visual acuity should be considered carefully because decreased visual acuity could result in some patients.

Ű¿öµå

Good visual acuity, Idiopathic epiretinal membrane, Inner limiting membrane, Removal of membrane, Vitrectomy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå