¿À³ëµð ¼¼Æ÷³» °õÆÎÀÌ µ¢ÀÌ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½Ã½Å°æº´Áõ 1¿¹
A Case of Optic Neuropathy Caused by Fungal Ball in an Onodi Cell

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 3È£ p.426 ~ p.431

ÇÑ¿µ¼ö(Han Young-Soo) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñÀÇ·á¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¾çÂù¹Î(Yang Chan-Min) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñÀÇ·á¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
½ÅÀçÈ£(Shin Jae-Ho) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °­µ¿°æÈñ´ëÇб³º´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÀαâ(Park In-Ki) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø °æÈñÀÇ·á¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñ Àû: ¿À³ëµð ¼¼Æ÷³» °õÆÎÀÌ µ¢ÀÌ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½Ã½Å°æº´Áõ 1¿¹¸¦ º¸°íÇϰíÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

Áõ·Ê¿ä¾à: 63¼¼ ¿©ÀÚ°¡ 1ÁÖ Àü¿¡ Àç¹ßÇÑ ¿ì¾È ½Ã·ÂÀúÇÏ¿Í ÅëÁõÀ¸·Î Áø·á ÀǷڵǾú´Ù. 2ÁÖ Àü¿¡ ¿ì¾È ½Ã·ÂÀúÇÏ·Î ¹æ¹®ÇÑ Å¸ º´¿ø¿¡¼­ ¿ì¾È ½Ã½Å°æ¿°À¸·Î Áø´Ü¹Þ°í °í¿ë·® ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å Åõ¿© ÈÄ È£ÀüµÇ¾ú´Ù°¡ 1ÁÖ Àü¿¡ Àç¹ßÇÏ¿´´Ù. Ÿ º´¿ø Áø·áÀÇ·Ú¼­¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¸é ³úÀÚ±â°ø¸í ¿µ»ó¿¡¼­ ´Ù¹ß¼º °æÈ­ÁõÀ» ÀǽÉÇÒ ¼Ò°ßÀº ¾øÀ¸¸ç ÄÚ°ç±¼³» ¾à°£ÀÇ ¿°Áõ ¿Ü¿¡´Â Ưº°ÇÑ ¼Ò°ßÀº ¾ø´Ù°í ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÃÊÁø ½Ã ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀº ¿ì¾ÈÀº ¾ÈÀü¼öÁö 10 cm, Á¾ÈÀº 1.0 ÀÌ¿´°í, ¿ì¾È¿¡¼­ »ó´ëÀû ±¸½É¼º µ¿°øÀå¾Ö°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¾ÈÀú°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ¿ì¾ÈÀÇ ½Ã½Å°æ À¯µÎºÎÁ¾ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú°í ½Ã¾ß°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ¿ì¾ÈÀº ¿ÏÀü ½Ã¾ß°á¼ÕÀ» º¸¿´°í, VEP°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ¿ì¾È¿¡¼­ P100ÀÌ ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. Àç¹ßµÈ ½Ã½Å°æ¿°À¸·Î Áø´ÜÇÏ°í °í¿ë·® ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å Åõ¿© ÈÄ À¯µÎºÎÁ¾Àº °¨¼ÒÇÏ°í ½Ã·ÂÀº 0.6À¸·Î È£ÀüµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, 2ÁÖ ÈÄ ´Ù½Ã ¿ì¾È ½Ã·ÂÀÌ 0.4·Î ¾ÇÈ­µÇ¾ú´Ù.
¿ÜºÎ ³úÀÚ±â°ø¸í¿µ»ó È®ÀÎ °á°ú ¿ìÃø ¿À³ëµð ¼¼Æ÷³» °õÆÎÀÌ µ¢ÀÌ¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ½Ã½Å°æº´ÁõÀÌ ÀǽɵǾî À̺ñÀÎÈİú¿¡¼­ °õÆÎÀÌ µ¢ÀÌ Á¦°Å ¼ö¼úÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. ¼ö¼ú 3ÁÖ ÈÄ ½Ã·ÂÀº 0.9·Î ȸº¹µÇ¾ú°í, ¾ÈÀú°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ ½Ã½Å°æ À¯µÎºÎÁ¾Àº °üÂûµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, VEP°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ Á¤»ó ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿´´Ù.

°á ·Ð: ½Ã½Å°æ¿°ÀÌ ÀǽɵǴ ȯÀÚ¿¡¼­ ¿À³ëµð ¼¼Æ÷³» º´º¯ ¶ÇÇÑ °¨º°ÇØ¾ß Çϸç ÇÊ¿äÇÑ °æ¿ì ¿µ»óÇÐÀû °Ë»ç·Î Áø´ÜÇÏ°í ½Ã·Âȸº¹À» À§ÇØ ½Å¼ÓÇÏ°Ô ¼ö¼úÀû Á¦°Å¸¦ ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù.
Purpose: To report a rare case of optic neuropathy caused by a fungal ball in an Onodi cell.

Case summary: A 63-year-old female was referred to our clinic with relapsed visual loss and ocular pain in the right eye. She had been diagnosed as optic neuritis 14 days before and given pulse steroid therapy. She recovered to normal but relapsed 7 days before. In medical referral there was no suspected multiple sclerosis but only a few inflammation in the paranasal sinuses. On our initial examination, best corrected visual acuity was counting finger at 10 cm in the right eye, and 1.0 in the left eye, along with relative afferent pupillary defect in the right eye. The fundoscopic examinations disclosed disc swelling; nearly total visual field defect was observed on visual field examination and visual evoked potential test revealed decreased amplitude at P100 wave in the right eye. Clinical impression was relapsed optic neuritis. After the administration of pulse steroid therapy, her disc swelling was decreased and visual acuity was recovered to 0.6, however, visual acuity was exacerbated to 0.4 in 2 weeks. We checked outside brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the result showed optic neuropathy caused by a fungal ball in an Onodi cell. The patient was referred to otorhinolaryngologist and fungal ball was removed by endoscopic sinus surgery. 3 weeks after surgery the patient¡¯s visual acuity was 0.9, no disc swelling was found and visual evoked potential was recovered to normal.

Conclusions: An Onodi cell lesion should be considered in the differential diagnosis of optic neuritis, identified by imaging studies and promptly removed by surgery for visual recovery.

Ű¿öµå

Fungal ball, Fungal sinusitis, Onodi cell, Optic neuropathy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå