¸Á¸·ºÐÁöÁ¤¸ÆÆó¼â¿¡¼­ Ȳ¹ÝºÎÁ¾ Ä¡·á·Î À¯¸®Ã¼°­³» º£¹Ù½ÃÁÖ¸¿ ÁÖÀÔ¼úÀÇ Àå±â È¿°ú
Intravitreal Bevacizumab Injection for Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Long-Term Results

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 3È£ p.379 ~ p.386

¾È¼º¹Î(Ahn Seong-Min) - ¸Þ¸®³îº´¿ø ¾È°ú
À̼öÁ¤(Lee Soo-Jung) - ÀÎÁ¦´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ÇØ¿î´ë¹éº´¿ø ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÁ¤¹Î(Park Jung-Min) - ¸Þ¸®³îº´¿ø ¾È°ú

Abstract

¸ñ Àû: ¸Á¸·ºÐÁöÁ¤¸ÆÆó¼âÀÇ È²¹ÝºÎÁ¾¿¡¼­ ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ 3ȸÀÇ À¯¸®Ã¼°­³» º£¹Ù½ÃÁÖ¸¿ ÁÖÀÔ¼úÀÇ Àå±âÈ¿°ú¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: ¸Á¸·ºÐÁöÁ¤¸ÆÆó¼â 56¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© 1°³¿ù °£°ÝÀ¸·Î ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ 3ȸÀÇ À¯¸®Ã¼³» º£¹Ù½ÃÁÖ¸¿ ÁÖÀÔ¼úÀ» ÇÑ È¯ÀÚ±º°ú ÃÖÃÊ 1ȸ ÁÖÀÔÇÑ È¯ÀÚ±ºÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐÇϰí Ȳ¹Ý ºÎÁ¾ Àç¹ß½Ã¿¡ °¢°¢ Ãß°¡ ÁÖÀÔÇÏ¿© ÃÖ¼Ò 12°³¿ù ÀÌ»ó ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, Áß½ÉȲ¹ÝµÎ²² ¹× ¸Á¸·ÇãÇ÷ »óÅ º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á °ú: 12°³¿ù µÚ¿¡ µÎ ±º ¸ðµÎ¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ ½Ã·ÂÈ£Àü ¹× Áß½ÉȲ¹ÝµÎ²² °¨¼Ò°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù(p£¼0.05). ±×·¯³ª ½Ã·ÂÈ£Àü Á¤µµ³ª Áß½ÉȲ¹ÝµÎ²² °¨¼Ò ÆøÀº ¿¬¼ÓÀûÀÎ 3ȸÀÇ º£¹Ù½ÃÁÖ¸¿ ÁÖÀÔ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ ±º¿¡¼­ ´õ ÁÁ¾Ò´Ù. Çü±¤¾ÈÀúÃÔ¿µ ¿µ»óÀ¸·Î ¸Á¸·ÇãÇ÷ »óÅÂÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÑ °á°ú, º£¹Ù½ÃÁÖ¸¿ÀÌ ¸Á¸·ÇãÇ÷À» Áõ°¡½ÃŰÁö´Â ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. °æ°ú °üÂû ±â°£ µ¿¾È °á¸·ÇÏÃâÇ÷, °æ¹ÌÇÑ ¾È¾Ð »ó½Â ÀÌ¿ÜÀÇ ¾È°úÀû ¹× Àü½ÅÀû ÇÕº´ÁõÀº ¾ø¾ú´Ù.

°á ·Ð: ¸Á¸·ºÐÁöÁ¤¸ÆÆó¼âÀÇ È²¹ÝºÎÁ¾¿¡¼­ À¯¸®Ã¼°­³» º£¹Ù½ÃÁÖ¸¿ ÁÖÀÔ¼úÀº ¾ÈÀüÇϰí È¿°úÀûÀÎ Ä¡·á°¡ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç ¿¬¼Ó 3ȸ ÁÖÀԽÿ¡´Â 1ȸ ÁÖÀԽú¸´Ù ´õ ÀÇ¹Ì ÀÖ´Â ½Ã·ÂÈ£Àü ¹× Áß½ÉȲ¹ÝµÎ²² °¨¼Ò¸¦ ±â´ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.
Purpose: To evaluate the long-term results of intravitreal bevacizumab injection for macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO).

Methods: Fifty-six eyes with macular edema secondary to BRVO were treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injection. They were classified into two groups, one group that received three initial intravitreal bevacizumab loadings at monthly intervals and a second group that received only one initial injection. In the two groups, additive injection was performed at recurrence. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT) and retinal ischemic change was analyzed for more than 12 months postoperatively.

Results: After 12 months of follow-up, mean BCVA improved and mean CMT reduced significantly in both groups (p< 0.05). However, the range of BCVA improvement and CMT reduction was wider in the three-injection group than in the single-injection group. Fluorescein angiography revealed posterior retinal ischemic changes; bevacizumab didn¡¯t seem to aggravate the ischemic change. No drug-related ocular or systemic side effects were observed in the follow-up period after intravitreal bevacizumab treatment except subconjunctival hemorrhage and a mild increase of intraocular pressure.

Conclusions: In patients with macular edema secondary to BRVO, intravitreal bevacizumab injection was a safe and effective treatment, and a more significant visual improvement and reduction of macular edema was achieved after three initial loadings rather than after a single injection.

Ű¿öµå

Bevacizumab, Initial loading, Macular edema, Retinal ischemia, Retinal vein occlusion
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå