°¢¸·±¼Àý±³Á¤ ¼ú ÈÄ ºñÁ¢Ã˼º ¾È¾Ð°è·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀÇ ÀúÆò°¡ Á¤µµ
Analysis of Postoperative Intraocular Pressure Underestimation Measured with Non Contact Tonometry after Corneal Refractive Surgery
´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 2È£ p.167 ~ p.172
±è¿í°â(Kim Wook-Kyum) - ºñ¾Øºû °³²¹àÀº¼¼»ó¾È°úÀÇ¿ø
Á¶Àº¿µ(Cho Eun-Young) - ºñ¾Øºû °³²¹àÀº¼¼»ó¾È°úÀÇ¿ø
±èÈñ¼±(Kim Hee-Sun) - ºñ¾Øºû °³²¹àÀº¼¼»ó¾È°úÀÇ¿ø
ÀÌÈñ°æ(Lee Hee-Kyung) - ºñ¾Øºû °³²¹àÀº¼¼»ó¾È°úÀÇ¿ø
±èÁø±¹(Kim Jin-Kuk) - ºñ¾Øºû °³²¹àÀº¼¼»ó¾È°úÀÇ¿ø
Abstract
¸ñ Àû: °¢¸·±¼Àý±³Á¤¼ú ÈÄ ºñÁ¢Ã˾Ⱦаè·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀÇ ÀúÆò°¡ Á¤µµ°¡ ¾î´À Á¤µµÀÎÁö¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: º»¿ø¿¡¼ 2011³â 1¿ù¿¡¼ 2¿ù±îÁö ¶ó½ÄÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ 253¸í°ú ¶ó¼½À» ½ÃÇàÇÑ 281¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºñÁ¢Ã˾Ⱦаè·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¼ö¼ú Àü ÈÄÀÇ ¾È¾ÐÀÇ Â÷À̸¦ ¼ú ÈÄ ¾È¾ÐÀÇ ÀúÆò°¡·Î °£ÁÖÇÏ¿© ±× Á¤µµ¸¦ ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾ÒÀ¸¸ç ¾È¾Ð °¨¼Ò¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ÁÖ´Â ¼ú Àü ÀÎÀÚµéÀ» ´ÙÁßȸ±Í¹æ ¹ýÀ¸·Î ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á °ú: ¼ú ÈÄ ºñÁ¢Ã˾Ⱦа踦 ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ¾È¾Ð °¨¼Ò´Â ¼ö¼ú ½Ã ³ªÀÌ(r=-0.0420, p=0.03), °¢¸·ÀýÁ¦·®(r=0.0466, p£¼0.01), ±×¸®°í ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ý (¶ó½Ä ȤÀº ¶ó¼½)¿¡ µû¶ó(r=0.6006, p£¼0.01) À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸¿´´Ù. ¶ó½Ä ÈÄ 100 ¥ìmÀÇ °¢¸·µÎ²²°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÒ ¶§, 26¼¼ ¹Ì¸¸¿¡¼ ¾È¾ÐÀÌ 6.29 ¡¾ 2.40 mmHg°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´°í 26¼¼ À̻󿡼 6.12 ¡¾ 2.53 mmHg°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù(p=0.05). ¶ó¼½ ÈÄ 100 ¥ìmÀÇ °¢¸·µÎ²²°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÒ ¶§, 26¼¼ ¹Ì¸¸¿¡¼ ¾È¾ÐÀÌ 5.77 ¡¾ 2.37 mmHg°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´°í, 26¼¼ À̻󿡼 5.44 ¡¾ 2.62 mmHg °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù(p=0.05).
°á ·Ð: °¢¸·±¼Àý±³Á¤¼ú ÈÄ ºñÁ¢Ã˾Ⱦаè·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀº °¢¸·ÀýÁ¦·®ÀÌ Áõ°¡ÇÒ¼ö·Ï, ³ªÀ̰¡ ¾î¸±¼ö·Ï, ¶ó½ÄÀ» ¹ÞÀº °æ¿ì ´õ¿í °¨¼ÒÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. <´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014;55(2):167-172>
Purpose: To analyze the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) underestimation measured with non-contact tonometry after corneal refractive surgery.
Methods: The postoperative IOP decrease measured with non-contact tonometry (NCT), regarded as IOP underestimation, was calculated in 253 LASIK patients and 281 LASEK patients. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the preoperative factors which affect postoperative IOP underestimation. The right eye results were reported in this paper.
Results: The postoperative IOP decrease was affected by age (r = -0.0420, p = 0.03), corneal ablation depth (r = 0.0466, p < 0.01), and operation method (LASIK or LASEK) (r = 0.6006, p < 0.01). For every 100 ¥ìm decrease of corneal thickness by LASIK, the IOP decreased 6.29 ¡¾ 2.40 mm Hg in patients under 26 years of age and 6.12 ¡¾ 2.53 mm Hg in patients above 26 years of age (p = 0.05). For every 100 ¥ìm decrease of corneal thickness by LASEK, the IOP decreased 5.77 ¡¾ 2.37 mm Hg in patients under 26 years of age and 5.44 ¡¾ 2.62 mm Hg in patients above 26 years of age (p = 0.05).
Conclusions: The postoperative IOP underestimation measured with NCT was more prominent in younger-aged patients after LASIK than LASEK with deeper ablation depth.
Ű¿öµå
Central corneal thickness, Intraocular pressure, LASEK, LASIK, Non-contact tonometer
KMID :
0360220140550020167
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)