ÆèÅäÃÊ ·¹ÀÌÀú¿Í ¸Å´º¾ó Æ®·¹ÆÄÀÎÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢¸·À̽ÄÀÇ Ãʱâ ÀÓ»ó¼ºÀû ºñ±³
Comparison of Early Clinical Result of Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty Using FSlaser Versus Manual Trephine
´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 1È£ p.66 ~ p.72
±è±Ù¿µ(Kim Geun-Yeong) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°ú ¹× ½Ã°úÇб³½Ç
¹ÚÁøÇü(Park Jin-Heung) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°ú ¹× ½Ã°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌ¿ëÀº(Lee Yong-Eun) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°ú ¹× ½Ã°úÇб³½Ç
ÁÖõ±â(Joo Choun-Ki) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°ú ¹× ½Ã°úÇб³½Ç
Abstract
¸ñÀû: ÆèÅäÃÊ·¹ÀÌÀú¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢¸·À̽ļúÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ±× ÀÓ»ó°á°ú¸¦ ¸Å´º¾ó Æ®·¹ÆÄÀÎ(manual trephine)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ °¢¸·À̽ļú°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© º¸°íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.
´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: ¸Å´º¾ó Æ®·¹ÆÄÀÎ(manual trephine)À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢¸·À̽ļúÀ» ¹ÞÀº 17¾È(17¸í), ÆèÅäÃÊ·¹ÀÌÀú¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢ ¸·À̽ļúÀ» ¹ÞÀº 13¾È(13¸í)¿¡ ´ëÇØ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â, °¢¸·³½Ã, ±¼Àý³½Ã, °¢¸·³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷¼ö µîÀÇ ¼úÈÄ ÀÓ»ó¼ºÀûÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á°ú: ÆèÅäÃÊ·¹ÀÌÀú¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢¸·À̽ļú±º¿¡¼ ÃÖ´ë±³Á¤½Ã·Â(logMAR)Àº ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 2, 4, 6°³¿ù°¿¡ °¢°¢ 0.31 ¡¾ 0.17, 0.23 ¡¾ 0.15, 0.18 ¡¾ 0.14¿´À¸¸ç, ¸Å´º¾ó Æ®·¹ÆÄÀÎ(manual trephine)À» »ç¿ëÇÑ ±º¿¡¼´Â °¢°¢ 0.55 ¡¾ 0.41, 0.45 ¡¾ 0.28, 0.35 ¡¾ 0.22 (p=0.056, p=0.025, p=0.313)·Î ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÀÚµ¿±¼Àý°Ë»ç»ó Æò±Õ °¢¸·³½Ã´Â ÆèÅäÃÊ·¹ÀÌÀú±º¿¡¼ 2, 4, 6°³¿ù°¿¡ °¢°¢ 5.35 ¡¾ 1.57, 4.24 ¡¾ 1.97, 3.65 ¡¾ 1.31, ¸Å´º¾ó Æ®·¹ÆÄÀÎ »ç¿ë±º 8.32 ¡¾ 2.75, 6.80 ¡¾ 2.50, 4.54 ¡¾ 1.25 (p=0.031, p=0.041, p=0.370)·Î ÃøÁ¤µÇ¾ú ´Ù. ¼úÈÄ 6°³¿ù° µÎ ±º¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ °¢¸·³»ÇǼ¼Æ÷¼ö´Â µÎ ±º¿¡¼ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.
°á·Ð: ÆèÅäÃÊ·¹ÀÌÀú¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢¸·À̽ļúÀº ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ¸Å´º¾ó Æ®·¹ÆÄÀÎÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÉºÎÇ¥Ãþ°¢¸·À̽ļú°ú ºñ±³ÇØ ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ Ãʱ⠽÷ ȸº¹°úÁ¤ÀÌ ºü¸£°í, ³½ÃÀÇ À¯¹ß·®ÀÌ ´õ Àû¾î À̸¦ ´ëüÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ¼ö¼ú¹æ¹ýÀ̶ó ÇÏ°Ú´Ù.
Purpose: To compare outcomes of femtosecond laser-enabled deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (IE-DALK) versus manual trephine using deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (Manual DALK, M-DALK).
Methods: Seventeen eyes from 17 patients underwent manual deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and femtosecond laser- enabled deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty was performed in 13 eyes of 13 patients. Postoperative clinical outcomes such as best corrected visual acuity, refractive astigmatism, keratometric astigmatism, endothelial cell density were compared between the two groups.
Results: The mean log MAR best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.31 ¡¾ 0.17, 0.23 ¡¾ 0.15, 0.18 ¡¾ 0.14 in the IE-DALK group, and 0.55 ¡¾ 0.41, 0.45 ¡¾ 0.28, 0.35 ¡¾ 0.22 (p = 0.056, p = 0.025, p = 0.313) in the M-DALK group at postoperative 2, 4, and 6 months respectively. The mean keratometric cylinder was 5.35 ¡¾ 1.57, 4.24 ¡¾ 1.97, 3.65 ¡¾ 1.31 in the IE-DALK, 8.32 ¡¾ 2.75, 6.80 ¡¾ 2.50, 4.54 ¡¾ 1.25 (p = 0.031, p = 0.041, p = 0.370) in the M-DALK group at postoperative 2, 4, and 6 months respectively. Endothelial cell counts in the two groups did not differ significantly at postoperative 6 months.
Conclusions: The IE-DALK showed better results in BSCVA and keratometric astigmatism in the early postoperative period, in comparison with the M-DALK, and can be considered as a valuable method in deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Å°¿öµå
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, Endothelial cell density, Femtosecond laser
KMID :
0360220140550010066
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)