ºñÁ¢ÃË ¾È¾Ð°è, ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾Ð°è, Åä³ëÆæ, °ñµå¸¸ ¾ÐÆò¾È¾Ð°èÀÇ ¾È¾Ð ºñ±³
Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measured by Non-Contact Tonometer, Rebound Tonometer, Tono-Pen, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 1È£ p.47 ~ p.53

À̰æ½Ä(Lee Kung-Sik) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç ½Ã±â´É°³¹ß¿¬±¸¼Ò
±è¼¼°æ(Kim Se-Kyung) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç ½Ã±â´É°³¹ß¿¬±¸¼Ò
±èÀÀ±Ç(Kim Eung-Kweon) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç ½Ã±â´É°³¹ß¿¬±¸¼Ò
±èÅÂÀÓ(Kim Tae-Im) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Àǰú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç ½Ã±â´É°³¹ß¿¬±¸¼Ò

Abstract

¸ñÀû: ºñÁ¢ÃË ¾È¾Ð°è, ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾Ð°è(Icare¢ç), Åä³ëÆæ(TONO-PEN AVIA¢ç)À¸·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀ» °ñµå¸¸ ¾ÐÆò¾È¾Ð°è·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î ºñ±³Çϰí ÀÓ»óÀû À¯¿ë¼ºÀ» °íÂûÇÑ´Ù.

´ë»ó°ú ¹æ¹ý: Á¤»ó¾È 71¾ÈÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ºñÁ¢ÃË ¾È¾Ð°è, ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾Ð°è, Åä³ëÆæ, °ñµå¸¸ ¾ÐÆò¾È¾Ð°è·Î ¾È¾ÐÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ¾È¾Ð°èº° ÃøÁ¤°ª Â÷À̸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù.

°á°ú: ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾ÐÀÌ °ñµå¸¸ ¾È¾Ð°ú °¡Àå ³ôÀº ÀÏÄ¡¼ºÀ» º¸¿´°í[ICC 0.811, 95%CI 0.712-0.878], Bland-Altman plot °á°ú, ºñÁ¢ÃË ¾È¾Ð°è¿¡¼­ Æò±Õ Â÷À̰ªÀº °¡Àå Àû¾úÀ¸³ª(+0.2 mmHg) ½Å·Ú±¸°£Àº °¡Àå ³Ð¾ú°í(95%CI; ¡¾5.05 mmHg), ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾Ð°è´Â Æò±Õ Â÷ÀÌ °ªÀÌ ´Ù¼Ò Àû°í(-0.7 mmHg) º¯µ¿ÆøÀÌ °¡Àå Á¼¾Ò´Ù(95%CI; ¡¾3.75 mmHg).

°á·Ð: ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾Ð°è·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾ÐÀº °ñµå¸¸ ¾ÐÆò¾È¾Ð°è·Î ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ ¾È¾Ð°ú ¿ì¼öÇÑ ÀÏÄ¡¸¦ º¸¿© °ñµå¸¸ ¾ÐÆò¾È¾Ð°è·Î ¾È¾ÐÃøÁ¤ÀÌ ¾î ·Á¿î °æ¿ì ¸®¹Ù¿îµå ¾È¾Ð°è°¡ ´ëü °Ë»ç¹ýÀÌ µÉ ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î ±â´ëµÈ´Ù.
Purpose: To compare the level of accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements attained by non-contact tonometer (NCT), rebound tonometer (RT) Icare¢ç, and Tono-Pen (TONO-PEN AVIA¢ç), using Goldmann Applanation tonometer (GAT) as a reference value and to explore their clinical usefulness.

Methods: In a prospective study of 71 normal eyes, IOP was measured with NCT, RT, Tono-Pen and GAT. The IOP values of were then compared between the eyes.

Results: RT showed statistically most significant agreement with the GAT [ICC 0.811, 95%CI 0.712-0.878]. In analysis of Bland-Altman plots, NCT showed the smallest mean bias (+0.2 mm Hg) and widest CI (95%CI; ¡¾5.05 mm Hg), RT showed relatively small mean bias (-0.7 mm Hg) and narrowest CI (95%CI; ¡¾3.75 mm Hg).

Conclusions: There was a significant agreement between the RT and the GAT measurements. We expect RT to be considered as a reliable alternative when IOP measurement with GAT is not feasible.

Ű¿öµå

Goldmann applanation tonometer, Rebound tonometer
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå