¿øÀú : »ýüÀü±â ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º ºÐ¼®±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÅÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ Ã¼¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ÀÇ º¯È
Change of Body Composition Analyzed by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) in Renal Transplant Recipients
´ëÇѽÅÀåÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.211 ~ p.219
ÇãÀΰæ(Hur In-Kyong) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÀº¿µ(Lee Eun-Young) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
Á¶ÁöÇü(Cho Ji-Hyung) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
ÃÖÁö¿µ(Choi Ji-Young) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ³»°úÇб³½Ç
¹Ú¼±Èñ(Park Sun-Hee) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±èÂù´ö(Kim Chan-Duck) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿ë¸²(Kim Yong-Lim) - °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ³»°úÇб³½Ç
Abstract
¸ñ Àû: º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼´Â ½ÅÀÌ½Ä È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ Ã¼¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ÀÇ º¯È¸¦ »ýüÀü±â ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º ºÐ¼®±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ¾Ë¾Æº¸°í, ÀÌ¿Í °ü·Ã ÀÖ´Â ÀÓ»óÀûÀÎ ¿äÀεéÀ» ã¾Æº¸°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
¹æ ¹ý: °æºÏ´ëÇб³ º´¿ø¿¡¼ ½ÅÀ̽ÄÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÑ 45¸íÀÇ ½ÅȯÀÚ¸¦ ÀÌ½Ä Àü Åõ¼® À¯¹« ¹× Åõ¼® ¹æ¹ýÀ» ±âÁØÀ¸·Î Ç÷¾× Åõ¼®À» ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ±º (Ç÷¾×Åõ¼®±º, n=32), º¹¸· Åõ¼®À» ¹ÞÀº ȯÀÚ±º (º¹¸·Åõ¼®±º, n=5), Åõ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í ÀÖÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´ø ȯÀÚ±º (º¸Á¸ÀûÄ¡·á±º, n=8)À¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ±ºÀÇ È¯ÀÚµéÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÀÌ½Ä Àü°ú ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 1, 3, 6°³¿ù¿¡ »ýüÀü±â ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º ºÐ¼®±â (InBody720, Biospace, ¼¿ï, Çѱ¹)¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÃÑü¼öºÐ (%TBW), ¼¼Æ÷¿Ü¾× (%ECF), ¼¼Æ÷³»¾× (%ICF) ¹× ºÎÁ¾ Áö¼ö (edema index)¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ÀÌ½Ä ÀüÈÄÀÇ ¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ÀÇ º¯È¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Ç÷¾Ð, Ç÷û Å©·¹¾ÆƼ´Ñ, 24 ½Ã°£ ´¢´Ü¹é µîÀÇ ÀÓ»óÀû Ç¥ÁöÀÚµéÀ» µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ü¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ º¯È¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°á °ú: ½ÅÀÌ½Ä Àü ¼¼ ±º °£ÀÇ »ó±â ü¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ Áö¼öµéÀº ÀÇ¹Ì ÀÖ´Â Â÷ÀÌ°¡ ¾ø¾ú´Ù. Àüü ´ë»óȯÀÚµéÀº ½ÅÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ ÀÌ½Ä Àü°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© %TBW°ú %ICF´Â Åë°èÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ º¯È¸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸³ª, %ECF´Â ÀÌ½Ä Á÷ÈĺÎÅÍ ÀÇ¹Ì ÀÖ°Ô °¨¼ÒµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç (ÀÌ½Ä Àü 21.13¡¾3.04 L/kg, ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 1°³¿ù 20.03¡¾2.37 L/kg, ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 3°³¿ù 19.61¡¾2.18 L/kg, ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 6°³¿ù 18.32¡¾5.02 L/kg: °¢°¢ p=0.007, p<0.001, p=0.001) ºÎÁ¾ Áö¼öµµ ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 1°³¿ùºÎÅÍ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´´Ù (ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 1°³¿ù 0.354¡¾0.014, ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 3°³¿ù 0.352¡¾0.011, ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 6°³¿ù 0.348¡¾0.014: °¢°¢ p=0.016, p=0.012). ºÎÁ¾Áö¼ö´Â ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 1°³¿ù°ú 3°³¿ù¿¡ Ç÷¾× Åõ¼®±º¿¡¼ ´Ù¸¥ µÎ ±º¿¡ ºñÇØ À¯ÀÇÇÏ°Ô ³ô¾ÒÀ¸³ª ´Ù¸¥ ü¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ÀÇ ÁöÇ¥µéÀº ÀÌ½Ä Àü Åõ¼®¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷ÀÌ´Â ¾ø¾ú´Ù. ÀÓ»óÀû Ç¥ÁöÀÚ Áß Ç÷û Å©·¹¾ÆƼ´Ñ°ú 24½Ã°£ ´¢´Ü¹éÀº ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 1, 3°³¿ùÀÇ %ECF¿Í À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´°í ÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ 3°³¿ùÀÇ %TBW¿Í À¯ÀÇÇÑ ¾çÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
°á ·Ð: ½ÅÀÌ½Ä ÈÄ È¯ÀÚµéÀº ÀÌ½Ä Á÷ÈĺÎÅÍ ECFÀÇ ÇöÀúÇÑ °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸ÀÌ°Ô µÇ¸ç, ±× ÈÄ TBW ¹× ICFÀÇ º¯È°¡ ¼¼È÷ µÚµû¸£°Ô µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Ã¼¼öºÐ ºÐÆ÷ÀÇ Á¤»óÈ´Â ´¢´Ü¹é·®ÀÌ Àû°í Ç÷û Å©·¹¾ÆƼ´ÑÀÌ ³·À»¼ö·Ï »¡¸® ÀϾ°Ô µÇ¸ç, ÀÌ½Ä Àü Åõ¼® À¯¹«³ª Åõ¼® ¹æ¹ý°ú´Â ¹«°üÇÏ¿´´Ù. ÇâÈÄ ´õ ¸¹Àº ¼ö ÀÇ È¯ÀÚ¸¦ ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÑ ¿¬±¸°¡ ÇÊ¿äÇÒ °ÍÀ¸·Î »ç·áµÈ´Ù.
Purpose : To investigate the changes of body fluid status after kidney transplantation (KT) and to find out the associated factors.
Methods : Forty-five patients who had received KT were classified into hemodialysis (n=32), peritoneal dialysis (n=5), and preemptive (n=8) groups by dialysis modality. %TBW, %ECF, %ICF, and edema index which were examined by bioelectrical impedance analysis as well as clinical parameters were prospectively measured before KT and 1st month, 3rd month, 6th month after KT.
Results : Before KT, there were no significant differences in all of the parameters listed above among the three groups. Mean %TBW and %ICF were not different compared to those of before KT. In contrast, mean %ECF markedly decreased within 1st month (before KT 21.13¡¾3.04 L/kg, 1st month 20.03 ¡¾2.37 L/kg, 3rd month 19.61¡¾2.18 L/kg, 6th month 18.32¡¾5.02 L/kg: p=0.007, p<0.001, p=0.001, respectively). Edema index also decreased from 1st month (1st month 0.354¡¾0.014, 3rd month 0.352 ¡¾0.011, 6th month 0.348¡¾0.014: p=0.016, p=0.012, respectively). Only edema index was higher at 1st
and 3rd month in hemodialysis group. Serum creatinine and 24 hour urine total protein were positively correlated with %ECF at 1st and 3rd month, and with %TBW at 3rd month.
Conclusion : The recovery of body water distribution after KT starts with reduction of ECF within the 1st month. Serum creatinine and proteinuria are related to the recovery. No significant difference according to dialysis modality was found. Further study with larger sample size is necessary to confirm these findings.
Å°¿öµå
Electric impedance, Extracellular fluid, Kidney transplantation
KMID :
0359920080270020211
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
No significant difference according to dialysis modality was found