Two-port access versus four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy

´ëÇÑ»êºÎÀΰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 57±Ç 5È£ p.379 ~ p.385

ÃÖ¿ø±Ô(Choi Won-Kyu) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
±èÀå±Ô(Kim Jang-Kew) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
¾çÁ¤º¸(Yang Jung-Bo) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
°í¿µº¹(Ko Young-Bok) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
³²»ó·û(Nam Sang-Lyun) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
À̱âȯ(Lee Ki-Hwan) - Chungnam National University School of Medicine Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to compare the surgical outcomes between two-port access and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy.

Methods: Four hundred and eighty nine patients who had received two-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=175) and four-port access laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy (n=314) in Chungnam National University Hospital from January 2009 to August 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The data were compared between the bilaterality of the cysts and cyst diameter of less than 6 cm and 6 cm or more.

Results: There were no significant differences in patient¡¯s age, parity, body weight, body mass index and history of previous surgery between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group. Bilaterality of ovarian cysts was more in fourport access laparoscopy group (13.7% vs. 32.5%, P=0.000). There were no significant differences in operation time, hemoglobin change, hospital stay, adhesiolysis, transfusion, and insertion of hemo-vac between the two-port and four-port access laparoscopy group for size matched compare. However additional analgesics were more in four-port access laparoscopy group for unilateral ovarian cystectomy.

Conclusion: Two-port access laparoscopic surgery was feasible and safe for unilateral and bilateral ovarian cystectomy compare with four-port access laparoscopic surgery.

Ű¿öµå

Cystectomy, Ovarian cysts, Two-port access laparoscopy
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Ű¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆÇ³âµµ(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå