Deep learning-based personalised outcome prediction after acute ischaemic stroke.

Kim, Doo-Young; Choi, Kang-Ho; Kim, Ja-Hae; Hong, Jina; Choi, Seong-Min; Park, Man-Seok; Cho, Ki-Hyun
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry
2023May ; 94 ( 5 ) :369-378.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Kim, Doo-Young -
Choi, Kang-Ho -
Kim, Ja-Hae -
Hong, Jina -
Choi, Seong-Min -
Park, Man-Seok -
Cho, Ki-Hyun -
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whether deep learning models using clinical data and brain imaging can predict the long-term risk of major adverse cerebro/cardiovascular events (MACE) after acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) at the individual level has not yet been studied.

METHODS: A total of 8590 patients with AIS admitted within 5 days of symptom onset were enrolled. The primary outcome was the occurrence of MACEs (a composite of stroke, acute myocardial infarction or death) over 12 months. The performance of deep learning models (DeepSurv and Deep-Survival-Machines (DeepSM)) and traditional survival models (Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) and random survival forest (RSF)) were compared using the time-dependent concordance index ([Formula: see text] index).

RESULTS: Given the top 1 to all 60 clinical factors according to feature importance, CoxPH and RSF yielded [Formula: see text] index of 0.7236-0.8222 and 0.7279-0.8335, respectively. Adding image features improved the performance of deep learning models and traditional models assisted by deep learning models. DeepSurv and DeepSM yielded the best [Formula: see text] index of 0.8496 and 0.8531 when images were added to all 39 relevant clinical factors, respectively. In feature importance, brain image was consistently ranked highly. Deep learning models automatically extracted the image features directly from personalised brain images and predicted the risk and date of future MACEs at the individual level.

CONCLUSIONS: Deep learning models using clinical data and brain images could improve the prediction of MACEs and provide personalised outcome prediction for patients with AIS. Deep learning models will allow us to develop more accurate and tailored prognostic prediction systems that outperform traditional models. CI - ¨Ï Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
keyword
CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL NEUROLOGY; STROKE
MESH
Humans, *Stroke/diagnostic imaging, *Deep Learning, *Brain Ischemia/diagnostic imaging, Prognosis, *Ischemic Stroke
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Deep learning models using clinical data and brain images could improve the prediction of major adverse cerebro/cardiovascular events and provide personalised outcome prediction for patients with acute ischaemic stroke.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1136/jnnp-2022-330230
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå