Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Prostate Cancer Detection through Dual-Channel Tissue Feature Engineering.

Kim, Cho-Hee; Bhattacharjee, Subrata; Prakash, Deekshitha; Kang, Suki; Cho, Nam-Hoon; Kim, Hee-Cheol; Choi, Heung-Kook
Cancers
2021Mar ; 13 ( 7 ) :.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Kim, Cho-Hee - Department of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Bhattacharjee, Subrata - Department of Computer Engineering, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Prakash, Deekshitha - Department of Computer Engineering, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Kang, Suki - Department of Pathology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Cho, Nam-Hoon - Department of Pathology, Yonsei University Hospital, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Kim, Hee-Cheol - Department of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
Choi, Heung-Kook - Department of Computer Engineering, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea.
ABSTRACT
The optimal diagnostic and treatment strategies for prostate cancer (PCa) are constantly changing. Given the importance of accurate diagnosis, texture analysis of stained prostate tissues is important for automatic PCa detection. We used artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to classify dual-channel tissue features extracted from Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) tissue images, respectively. Tissue feature engineering was performed to extract first-order statistic (FOS)-based textural features from each stained channel, and cancer classification between benign and malignant was carried out based on important features. Recursive feature elimination (RFE) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) methods were used to identify significant features, which provided the best five features out of the extracted six features. The AI techniques used in this study for binary classification (benign vs. malignant and low-grade vs. high-grade) were support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), bagging tree, boosting tree, and dual-channel bidirectional long short-term memory (DC-BiLSTM) network. Further, a comparative analysis was carried out between the AI algorithms. Two different datasets were used for PCa classification. Out of these, the first dataset (private) was used for training and testing the AI models and the second dataset (public) was used only for testing to evaluate model performance. The automatic AI classification system performed well and showed satisfactory results according to the hypothesis of this study.
keyword
artificial intelligence; binary classification; dual-channel; prostate cancer; prostate cancer detection; texture analysis; tissue feature engineering
MESH
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
The automatic AI classification system performed well and showed satisfactory results according to the hypothesis of this study; All the AI models achieved high recall in classifying benign and malignant tissue samples, which is very helpful for researchers and clinicians. Each model was successfully validated using the two internal and one external test datasets, achieving accuracies of 96.1, 85.2 and 88.2% using SVM; 96.1, 85.1 and 87.9% using LR; 95.6, 80.8 and 91.3% using Bagging tree; 96.0, 86.0 and 93.5% using Boosting tree and 98.6, 93.6 and 89.2% using DC-BiLSTM, respectively.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.3390/cancers13071524
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå