Hunter, Jennifer; Arentz, Susan; Goldenberg, Joshua; Yang, Guoyan; Beardsley, Jennifer; Lee, Myeong Soo; Myers, Stephen P
Integrative medicine research
2020Sep ; 9 ( 3 ) :100484.
PMID : 32837904
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Hunter, Jennifer -
Arentz, Susan -
Goldenberg, Joshua -
Yang, Guoyan -
Beardsley, Jennifer -
Lee, Myeong Soo -
Myers, Stephen P -
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to an explosion of rapid reviews geared towards providing time sensitive answers for clinical and policy decision-makers. Rapid reviews (RRs) strike a balance between rigour and rapidity to minimise bias and optimise transparency within specified constraints. Methods: This review article appraised the methods and reporting standards of a convenience sample of RR protocols and RRs of COVID-19 clinical management questions, published in the first six-months of 2020. Inclusion criteria were all RR protocols evaluating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) registered on PROSPERO, and all RRs indexed on PubMed or published on the Oxford COVID-19 Evidence Service. A purpose-specific 9-item reporting checklist reflecting recommended minimum requirements for RRs was applied. Findings were synthesised and narrated in the context of methodological considerations for conducting and reporting RRs of TCIM. Results: Included studies were five RR protocols of TCIM and 16 RRs, of which five considered TCIM. Wide variations in RR methods were proposed or applied, as were the reporting standards. All five RRs that evaluated TCIM had the lowest reporting standards that limited reproducibility and transparency. Despite accepted recommendations, most RRs did not publish a protocol. Conclusions: We propose that specific research disciplines, such as TCIM, have a uniqueness that may lead to unacceptable outputs if minimum methodological standards are not applied. The recommended minimum requirements will optimise the credibility of rapid reviews of TCIM and limit the risk of prematurely disregarding a potentially effective intervention. CI - .
keyword
Evidence synthesis; Methodology; Rapid review; SARS-CoV-2; Systematic review
¸µÅ©