Long-term outcomes of patients with gastric adenoma in Korea: A retrospective observational study.

Park, Tae Young; Jeong, Su Jin; Kim, Tae Hyung; Lee, Jin; Park, Jongha; Kim, Tae Oh; Park, Yong Eun
Medicine
2020Mar ; 99 ( 12 ) :e19553.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Park, Tae Young - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maryknoll Hospital.
Jeong, Su Jin - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University
Kim, Tae Hyung - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University
Lee, Jin - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University
Park, Jongha - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University
Kim, Tae Oh - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University
Park, Yong Eun - Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University
ABSTRACT
New endoscopic resection techniques are constantly being developed for gastric adenoma, which can be classified as low or high grade according to the Vienna classification. However, long-term data on gastric adenoma (e.g., removal or follow-up after resection via endoscopy) remain lacking.We retrospectively analyzed 133 cases with gastric adenoma that underwent endoscopic resection from January 2010 to November 2018. We analyzed the risk factors and frequency of patients with synchronous and metachronous lesions after endoscopic resection for gastric adenoma and followed them for more than 2 years.One hundred six (79.7%) and 27 patients (20.3%) received endoscopic resection (ER) once and more than twice, respectively. Compared with the initial endoscopic biopsy pathological results, the upgraded and downgraded histological discrepancy rates were 10.5% (n?=?14) and 3.0% (n?=?4) after resection, respectively. The mean time to synchronous/metachronous recurrence was 2.23 years. The average lesion size at first procedure was larger in the multiple ER group than in the single ER group (2.00 vs 1.10?cm; P?=?.040). Eleven (8.3%) and 16 patients (12.0%) had recurred synchronous and metachronous lesions, respectively. In the multivariate Cox analysis of the recurrence group, intestinal metaplasia (hazard ratio, 2.761; 95% confidence interval, 1.117-6.820; P?=?.028) and lesion size (hazard ratio, 1.607; 95% confidence interval, 1.082-2.385; P?=?.019) were independent factors for receiving endoscopic resection more than twice.If patients have severe intestinal metaplasia or large size of lesion at endoscopic resection for gastric adenoma, periodic observation is necessary.
endoscopic submucosal dissection, gastric neoplasm, intestinal metaplasia, lesion size, recurrence, risk factors
MESH
Adenoma/classification/*surgery, Aged, Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/*methods, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Intestines/pathology, Male, Metaplasia, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Republic of Korea/epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology/*pathology/surgery
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Synchronous/metachronous tumors may occur in any patient, including those with low-grade dysplasia and high-grade dysplasia,, after ER of gastric adenoma; thus, it is necessary to follow up patients at a high risk carefully.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå