Prognostic Value of Volume-Based Metabolic Parameters of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Han, Sangwon; Kim, Hyesung; Kim, Yeon Joo; Suh, Chong Hyun; Woo, Sungmin
AJR. American journal of roentgenology
2018Sep ; 191 ( 36 ) :1-10.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Han, Sangwon - 1 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kim, Hyesung - 2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kim, Yeon Joo - 3 Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Suh, Chong Hyun - 4 Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Woo, Sungmin - 5 Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Republic of Korea.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of volume-based (18)F-FDG PET/CT parameters regarding the prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with uterine cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND

METHODS: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched until January 19, 2018. We included studies that evaluated pretreatment MTV or TLG as a prognostic factor in uterine cervical cancer with event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) as the endpoints. Effect sizes of the prognostic value of MTV and TLG were measured in terms of hazard ratio (HR) and were meta-analytically pooled. Multiple subgroup analyses stratified to clinicopathologic and PET/CT variables were performed to explore heterogeneity.

RESULTS: Twelve studies including 660 patients were included. Prognoses were worse in patients with high MTV and TLG, with pooled HRs of 5.89 (95% CI, 3.85-9.01; p < 0.00001) and 5.82 (95% CI, 3.62-9.35; p < 0.00001), respectively, for EFS and 6.62 (95% CI, 3.44-12.73; p < 0.00001) and 7.75 (95% CI, 3.48-17.27; p < 0.00001), respectively, for OS. At multiple subgroups analyses, the prognostic values of MTV and TLG for EFS were consistently significant, with pooled HRs of 5.08-7.30 and 4.80-15.83, respectively. CONCLUSION: Volume-based FDG PET/CT parameters were significant prognostic factors in patients with uterine cervical cancer. In spite of clinical and methodologic differences across the studies, patients with high MTV or TLG had a higher risk of adverse events or death.
keyword
PET; metabolic tumor volume; prognosis; total lesion glycolysis; uterine cervical cancer
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Prognoses were worse in patients with high MTV and TLG, with pooled HRs of 5.89 (95% CI, 3.85-9.01; p < 0.00001) and 5.82 (95% CI, 3.62-9.35; p < 0.00001), respectively, for EFS and 6.62 (95% CI, 3.44-12.73; p < 0.00001) and 7.75 (95% CI, 3.48-17.27; p < 0.00001), respectively, for OS.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.2214/AJR.18.19734.
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå