Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency and Ethanol Ablation for Treating Locally Recurrent Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Suh, Chong Hyun; Baek, Jung Hwan; Choi, Young Jun; Lee, Jeong Hyun
Thyroid : official journal of the American Thyroid Association
2016Mar ; 26 ( 3 ) :420-8.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Suh, Chong Hyun -
Baek, Jung Hwan -
Choi, Young Jun -
Lee, Jeong Hyun -
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and ethanol ablation (EA) for treating locally recurrent thyroid cancer. MATERIALS AND

METHODS: Ovid-MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for studies on the efficacy and safety of RFA and EA for treating locally recurrent thyroid cancer. The pooled proportions of the volume reduction ratio (VRR) ??0%, complete disappearance, changes in serum level of thyroglobulin (Tg), recurrence, and complications were assessed using random-effects modeling. Heterogeneity among studies was determined using the chi-square statistic for the pooled estimates and the inconsistency index I(2). To overcome heterogeneity, sensitivity analysis was performed.

RESULTS: Ten eligible studies were included, with a total sample size of 270 patients and 415 thyroid nodules. The pooled proportion of VRR ??0% after RFA (100%, recalculated 100%; I(2)?=?100%, recalculated I(2)?=?55.3%) was higher than that after EA (89.5%; I(2)?=?82.4%; p?=?0.2764); the pooled proportion of complete disappearance after RFA (68.8%) was higher than that after EA (53.4%; p?=?0.3384); and the pooled proportion of recurrence after RFA (0.0%) was lower than that after EA (2.4%, adjusted 1.6%; p?=?0.9766). However, these differences were not statistically significant. In addition, the pooled proportion of reduction in serum level of Tg after RFA was 71.6% and after EA was 93.8% (p?
na
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
The pooled proportion of VRR ¡Ã50% after RFA (100%, recalculated 100%; I(2) = 100%, recalculated I(2) = 55.3%) was higher than that after EA (89.5%; I(2) = 82.4%; p = 0.2764); the pooled proportion of complete disappearance after RFA (68.8%) was higher than that after EA (53.4%; p = 0.3384); and the pooled proportion of recurrence after RFA (0.0%) was lower than that after EA (2.4%, adjusted 1.6%; p = 0.9766).
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1089/thy.2015.0545.
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå