Dialysis Modality and Mortality in the Elderly: A Meta-Analysis.

Han, Seung Seok; Park, Jae Yoon; Kang, Soohee; Kim, Kyoung Hoon; Ryu, Dong-Ryeol; Kim, Hyunwook; Joo, Kwon Wook; Lim, Chun Soo; Kim, Yon Su; Kim, Dong Ki
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN
2015Jun ; 10 ( 6 ) :983-93.
저자 상세정보
Han, Seung Seok -
Park, Jae Yoon -
Kang, Soohee -
Kim, Kyoung Hoon -
Ryu, Dong-Ryeol -
Kim, Hyunwook -
Joo, Kwon Wook -
Lim, Chun Soo -
Kim, Yon Su -
Kim, Dong Ki -
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Identifying the appropriate choice between hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an unresolved issue in elderly patients with ESRD, who are at high risk for death but have a low chance of receiving kidney transplantation. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Data on 13,065 incident dialysis Korean patients (age??5 years) receiving HD (n=10,675) or PD (n=2390) were obtained from the Korean Health Insurance dataset. Multiple statistical approaches, including the multivariate Cox model, were used to compare mortality between Korean patients receiving PD and those receiving HD. Subsequently, meta-analysis of previous comparison studies (published since the year 2000; population-based studies) and the Korean dataset was performed.

RESULTS: During a mean duration of 1.8짹1.3 years (maximum of 5 years), the Korean PD group had a higher mortality rate than the Korean HD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.13 to 1.28]; P<0.001 by multivariate Cox model). The discrepancy between the two modalities was greater in the presence of certain conditions, such as diabetes mellitus or longer dialysis duration. In the meta-analysis, 15 studies involving >631,421 elderly patients were reviewed. Compared with HD, the pooled HR with PD was 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.20). When the meta-analysis was stratified by confounding factors, the survival benefit from HD was particularly strong in subgroups that had diabetes mellitus, had long dialysis duration (>1 year), or contained cohorts starting dialysis in the 1990s.

CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis that included results in Korean patients suggests a higher risk for death in elderly patients receiving PD than in those receiving HD. CI - Copyright ??2015 by the American Society of Nephrology.
keyword
dialysis modality; elderly; hemodialysis; mortality; peritoneal dialysis
MESH
Age Factors, Aged, Comorbidity, Female, Humans, Kidney Failure, Chronic/diagnosis/*mortality/*therapy, Male, Multivariate Analysis, Patient Selection, Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects/*mortality, Proportional Hazards Models, Renal Dialysis/adverse effects/*mortality, Republic of Korea/epidemiology, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome
링크

주제코드
주제명(Target field)
연구대상(Population)
연구참여(Sample size)
대상성별(Gender)
질병특성(Condition Category)
연구환경(Setting)
연구설계(Study Design)
연구기간(Period)
중재방법(Intervention Type)
중재명칭(Intervention Name)
키워드(Keyword)
유효성결과(Recomendation)
The Korean PD group had a higher mortality rate than the Korean HD group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.13 to 1.28]; P<0.001 by multivariate Cox model).
연구비지원(Fund Source)
근거수준평가(Evidence Hierarchy)
출판년도(Year)
참여저자수(Authors)
대표저자
DOI
10.2215/CJN.05160514.
KCD코드
ICD 03
건강보험코드