Satoh, Taroh; Xu, Rui-Hua; Chung, Hyun Cheol; Sun, Guo-Ping; Doi, Toshihiko; Xu, Jian-Ming; Tsuji, Akihito; Omuro, Yasushi; Li, Jin; Wang, Jin-Wan; Miwa, Hiroto; Qin, Shu-Kui; Chung, Ik-Joo; Yeh, Kun-Huei; Feng, Ji-Feng; Mukaiyama, Akihira; Kobayashi, Mikiro; Ohtsu, Atsushi; Bang, Yung-Jue
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
2014Jul ; 32 ( 19 ) :2039-49.
PMID : 24868024
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Satoh, Taroh -
Xu, Rui-Hua -
Chung, Hyun Cheol -
Sun, Guo-Ping -
Doi, Toshihiko -
Xu, Jian-Ming -
Tsuji, Akihito -
Omuro, Yasushi -
Li, Jin -
Wang, Jin-Wan -
Miwa, Hiroto -
Qin, Shu-Kui -
Chung, Ik-Joo -
Yeh, Kun-Huei -
Feng, Ji-Feng -
Mukaiyama, Akihira -
Kobayashi, Mikiro -
Ohtsu, Atsushi -
Bang, Yung-Jue -
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In Asian countries, paclitaxel once per week is used as second-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive tumors. The role of anti-HER2 agents, including lapatinib, in this setting and population is unclear. PATIENTS AND
METHODS: TyTAN was a two-part, parallel-group, phase III study in Asian patients. An open-label, dose-optimization phase (n = 12) was followed by a randomized phase (n = 261), in which patients who were HER2 positive by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) received lapatinib 1,500 mg once per day plus once-per-week paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) or paclitaxel alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), overall response rate (ORR), time to response, response duration, and safety. Analyses were based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) and gastrectomy status, prior trastuzumab therapy, and regional subpopulations.
RESULTS: Median OS was 11.0 months with lapatinib plus paclitaxel versus 8.9 months with paclitaxel alone (P = .1044), with no significant difference in median PFS (5.4 v 4.4 months) or TTP (5.5 v 4.4 months). ORR was higher with lapatinib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone (odds ratio, 3.85; P < .001). Better efficacy with lapatinib plus paclitaxel was demonstrated in IHC3+ compared with IHC0/1+ and 2+ patients and in Chinese compared with Japanese patients. A similar proportion of patients experienced adverse events with each treatment (lapatinib plus paclitaxel, 100% v paclitaxel alone, 98%). CONCLUSION: Lapatinib plus paclitaxel demonstrated activity in the second-line treatment of patients with HER2 FISH-positive IHC3+ advanced gastric cancer but did not significantly improve OS in the intent-to-treat population. CI - ??2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
na
MESH
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*therapeutic use, Area Under Curve, *Asian Continental Ancestry Group/genetics/statistics & numerical data, Biomarkers, Tumor/*analysis/genetics, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Paclitaxel/administration & dosage/*therapeutic use, Pilot Projects, Quinazolines/administration & dosage, Receptor, ErbB-2/*analysis/genetics, Stomach Neoplasms/chemistry/*drug therapy/epidemiology/pathology, Treatment Outcome
¸µÅ©