Progression-free survival as a surrogate for overall survival in advanced/recurrent gastric cancer trials: a meta-analysis.

Paoletti, Xavier; Oba, Koji; Bang, Yung-Jue; Bleiberg, Harry; Boku, Narikazu; Bouche, Olivier; Catalano, Paul; Fuse, Nozomu; Michiels, Stefan; Moehler, Markus; Morita, Satoshi; Ohashi, Yasuo; Ohtsu, Atsushi; Roth, Arnaud; Rougier, Philippe; Sakamoto, Junichi; Sargent, Daniel; Sasako, Mitsuru; Shitara, Kohei; Thuss-Patience, Peter; Van Cutsem, Eric; Burzykowski, Tomasz; Buyse, Marc
Journal of the National Cancer Institute
2013Nov ; 105 ( 21 ) :1667-70.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Paoletti, Xavier -
Oba, Koji -
Bang, Yung-Jue -
Bleiberg, Harry -
Boku, Narikazu -
Bouche, Olivier -
Catalano, Paul -
Fuse, Nozomu -
Michiels, Stefan -
Moehler, Markus -
Morita, Satoshi -
Ohashi, Yasuo -
Ohtsu, Atsushi -
Roth, Arnaud -
Rougier, Philippe -
Sakamoto, Junichi -
Sargent, Daniel -
Sasako, Mitsuru -
Shitara, Kohei -
Thuss-Patience, Peter -
Van Cutsem, Eric -
Burzykowski, Tomasz -
Buyse, Marc -
ABSTRACT
The traditional endpoint for assessing efficacy of chemotherapies for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer is overall survival (OS), but OS requires prolonged follow-up. We investigated whether progression-free survival (PFS) is a valid surrogate for OS. Using individual patient data from the GASTRIC meta-analysis, surrogacy of PFS was assessed through the correlation between the endpoints and through the correlation between the treatment effects on the endpoints. External validation of the prediction based on PFS was also evaluated. Individual data from 4069 patients in 20 randomized trials were analyzed. The rank correlation coefficient between PFS and OS was 0.853 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.852 to 0.854). The R (2) between treatment effects on PFS and on OS was 0.61 (95% CI = 0.04 to 1.00). Treatment effects on PFS and on OS were only moderately correlated, and we could not confirm the validity of PFS as a surrogate endpoint for OS in advanced/recurrent gastric cancer.
na
MESH
Biomarkers, Disease-Free Survival, Humans, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/*mortality/*therapy, Odds Ratio, Predictive Value of Tests, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Stomach Neoplasms/*mortality/pathology/*therapy, Treatment Outcome
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
This study could not conclude that PFS is an adequate surrogate for OS in AGC.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå