A comparison of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy for the correction of moderate hallux valgus deformity.

Park, C-H; Jang, J-H; Lee, S-H; Lee, W-C
The bone & joint journal
2013May ; 95-B ( 5 ) :649-56.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Park, C-H -
Jang, J-H -
Lee, S-H -
Lee, W-C -
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study was to compare the results of proximal and distal chevron osteotomy in patients with moderate hallux valgus. We retrospectively reviewed 34 proximal chevron osteotomies without lateral release (PCO group) and 33 distal chevron osteotomies (DCO group) performed sequentially by a single surgeon. There were no differences between the groups with regard to age, length of follow-up, demographic or radiological parameters. The clinical results were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scoring system and the radiological results were compared between the groups. At a mean follow-up of 14.6 months (14 to 32) there were no significant differences in the mean AOFAS scores between the DCO and PCO groups (93.9 (82 to 100) and 91.8 (77 to 100), respectively; p = 0.176). The mean hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle and sesamoid position were the same in both groups. The metatarsal declination angle decreased significantly in the PCO group (p = 0.005) and the mean shortening of the first metatarsal was significantly greater in the DCO group (p < 0.001). We conclude that the clinical and radiological outcome after a DCO is comparable with that after a PCO; longer follow-up would be needed to assess the risk of avascular necrosis.
Moderate hallux valgus, Osteotomy, Distal chevron, Proximal chevron, Hallux, Foot
MESH
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Hallux Valgus/*surgery, Humans, Middle Aged, Osteotomy/*methods, Retrospective Studies, Young Adult
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
There were no significant differences in the mean AOFAS scores between the DCO and PCO groups
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1302/0301-620X.95B5.30181
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå