Paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelle (230 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) vs. paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (60 mg/m(2)) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicenter randomized phase IIB trial.

Lee, Sung Yong; Park, Hee Sun; Lee, Kye Young; Kim, Hee Joung; Jeon, Young June; Jang, Tae Won; Lee, Kwan Ho; Kim, Young Chul; Kim, Kyu Sik; Oh, In Jae; Kim, Sun Young
Clinical lung cancer
2013May ; 14 ( 3 ) :275-82.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Lee, Sung Yong -
Park, Hee Sun -
Lee, Kye Young -
Kim, Hee Joung -
Jeon, Young June -
Jang, Tae Won -
Lee, Kwan Ho -
Kim, Young Chul -
Kim, Kyu Sik -
Oh, In Jae -
Kim, Sun Young -
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The development of paclitaxel-loaded polymeric micelle (PPM) has circumvented many of the infusion-related difficulties associated with standard solvent-based paclitaxel. PPM plus cisplatin combination chemotherapy showed significant antitumor activity in phase I and II studies. This prospective randomized controlled phase IIB study assessed the noninferiority of the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose PPM plus cisplatin to a standard dose of paclitaxel plus cisplatin. PATIENTS AND

METHODS: Patients with stage IIIB/IV or recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were chemonaive were eligible for participation. The patients were randomly assigned to receive PPM 230 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) plus cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) once every 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was to compare the response rate (RR) between the groups with coprimary analyses to assess noninferiority. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety.

RESULTS: A total of 276 patients were randomized to PPM plus cisplatin (n = 140) or paclitaxel plus cisplatin (n = 136). RR was 43.6% in the PPM plus cisplatin group and 41.9% in the paclitaxel plus cisplatin group. Noninferiority of PPM plus cisplatin compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin was confirmed for RR. There were no differences in progression-free survival and overall survival between the groups. Although there was a higher rate of grade 3 neutropenia in the PPM plus cisplatin group, the overall rate of adverse events was comparable between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: PPM in combination with cisplatin was well tolerated, and its response rate was noninferior to that of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC and who were chemonaive. CI - Copyright ??2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
na
MESH
Adult, Aged, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/*administration & dosage/adverse, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/*drug therapy/mortality, Cisplatin/administration & dosage/adverse effects, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Humans, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Lung Neoplasms/*drug therapy/mortality, Male, Micelles, Middle Aged, Paclitaxel/administration & dosage/adverse effects, Proportional Hazards Models
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
RR was 43.6% in the PPM plus cisplatin group and 41.9% in the paclitaxel plus cisplatin group. PPM in combination with cisplatin was well tolerated, and its response rate was noninferior to that of paclitaxel plus cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC and who were chemonaive
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1016/j.cllc.2012.11.005.
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå