Repeat biopsy for mutational analysis of non-small cell lung cancers resistant to previous chemotherapy: adequacy and complications.

Yoon, Hyun Jung; Lee, Ho Yun; Lee, Kyung Soo; Choi, Yoon-La; Ahn, Myung-Ju; Park, Keunchil; Ahn, Jin Seok; Sun, Jong-Mu; Kim, Jhingook; Kim, Tae Sung; Chung, Myung Jin; Yi, Chin A
Radiology
2012Dec ; 265 ( 3 ) :939-48.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Yoon, Hyun Jung -
Lee, Ho Yun -
Lee, Kyung Soo -
Choi, Yoon-La -
Ahn, Myung-Ju -
Park, Keunchil -
Ahn, Jin Seok -
Sun, Jong-Mu -
Kim, Jhingook -
Kim, Tae Sung -
Chung, Myung Jin -
Yi, Chin A -
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of repeat biopsy for mutational analysis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have a resistance history to previous chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS: This prospective study was institutional review board approved, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Of 126 patients referred for repeat biopsy (hereafter, rebiopsy) with NSCLC that was resistant to conventional chemotherapy or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 94 patients (31 men, 63 women; mean age +/- standard deviation, 57 years +/- 10.3) were selected for rebiopsy. Thirty-two patients were excluded for several reasons after strict review of the chest computed tomography (CT) images. Percutaneous transthoracic lung biopsy was performed with C-arm cone-beam CT guidance. The technical success rates for the rebiopsy and the adequacy rates of specimens for mutational analysis were evaluated. Any biopsy-related complications were recorded.

RESULTS: The technical success rate for biopsy was 100%. In 75 (80%) of 94 patients, specimens were adequate for mutational analysis. Of 75 specimens, 35 were tested for EGFR mutation, 34 for anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) rearrangement, and six for both. The results were positive for EGFR-sensitizing mutation (exon 19 or 21) in 20, for EGFR T790M mutation in five, and for ALK rearrangement in 11. Postprocedural complications occurred in 13 (14%) of 94 patients. CONCLUSION: When performed by employing rigorous CT criteria, rebiopsies for the mutational analysis of NSCLCs treated previously with chemotherapy are feasible in all patients and are adequate in approximately four-fifths of patients referred for gene analysis, with acceptable rates of complications. CI - (c) RSNA, 2012.
Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biopsy/*methods; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy/*genetics/radiography; *Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Exons; Feasibility Studies; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy/*genetics/radiography; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Patient Safety; Postoperative Complications/epidemiology; Prospective Studies; *Radiography, Interventional; Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics; Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/genetics; Retreatment
MESH
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Biopsy/*methods, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/drug therapy/*genetics/radiography, *Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, DNA Mutational Analysis, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Exons, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy/*genetics/radiography, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Patient Safety, Postoperative Complications/epidemiology, Prospective Studies, *Radiography, Interventional, Receptor Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics, Receptor, Epidermal Growth Factor/genetics, Retreatment
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
1. CT-guided repeat biopsy is a feasible technique (100% technical success rate in 94 patients; 80% gene profiling success rate in 75 of 94 patients) to acquire fresh cancer tissue for gene mutation analysis in patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was resistant to previous chemotherapy.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112613
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå