Non-lipid effects of rosuvastatin-fenofibrate combination therapy in high-risk Asian patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Lee, Sang-Hak; Cho, Kyoung-Im; Kim, Jang-Young; Ahn, Young Keun; Rha, Seung-Woon; Kim, Yong-Jin; Choi, Yun-Seok; Choi, Si Wan; Jeon, Dong Woon; Min, Pil-Ki; Choi, Dong-Ju; Baek, Sang Hong; Kim, Kwon Sam; Byun, Young Sup; Jang, Yangsoo
Atherosclerosis
2012Mar ; 221 ( 1 ) :169-75.
ÀúÀÚ »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Lee, Sang-Hak -
Cho, Kyoung-Im -
Kim, Jang-Young -
Ahn, Young Keun -
Rha, Seung-Woon -
Kim, Yong-Jin -
Choi, Yun-Seok -
Choi, Si Wan -
Jeon, Dong Woon -
Min, Pil-Ki -
Choi, Dong-Ju -
Baek, Sang Hong -
Kim, Kwon Sam -
Byun, Young Sup -
Jang, Yangsoo -
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the non-lipid effects of rosuvastatin-fenofibrate combination therapy with rosuvastatin monotherapy in high-risk Asian patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

METHODS: A total of 236 patients were initially screened. After six weeks of diet and life style changes, 180 of these patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two regimens: rosuvastatin 10 mg plus fenofibrate 160 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg. The primary outcome variables were the incidences of muscle or liver enzyme elevation. The patients were followed for 24 weeks during drug treatment and for an additional four weeks after drug discontinuation.

RESULTS: The rates of the primary outcome variables were similar between the two groups (2.8% and 3.9% in the combination and the rosuvastatin groups, respectively, p=1.00). The combination group had more, but not significantly, common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) (13.3% and 5.6%, respectively) and drug discontinuation due to AEs (10.0% and 3.3%, respectively) than the rosouvastatin group. Combination therapy was associated with higher elevations in homocysteine, blood urea nitrogen, and serum creatinine, whereas elevation in alanine aminotransferase was greater in the rosuvastatin group. Leukocyte count and hemoglobin level decreased to a greater extent in the combination group. The combination group showed greater reductions in TG and elevation in HDL-cholesterol. CONCLUSION: In our study population, the rosuvastatin-fenofibrate combination resulted in comparable incidences of myo- or hepatotoxicity as rosuvastatin monotherapy. However, this combination may need to be used with caution in individuals with underlying pathologies such as renal dysfunction (NCT01414803). CI - Copyright A??2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
na
MESH
Aged, *Asian Continental Ancestry Group, Biomarkers/blood, Blood Glucose/metabolism, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Cardiovascular Diseases/blood/ethnology/etiology/*prevention & control, Creatinine/blood, Drug Combinations, Drug-Induced Liver Injury/blood/etiology, Enzymes/blood, Female, Fenofibrate/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Fluorobenzenes/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Hemoglobins/metabolism, Homocysteine/blood, Humans, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Hyperlipidemias/blood/complications/*drug therapy/ethnology, Hypolipidemic Agents/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Lipids/blood, Liver/drug effects/enzymology, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle, Skeletal/drug effects/enzymology, Patient Selection, Pyrimidines/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Republic of Korea/epidemiology, Rhabdomyolysis/blood/chemically induced, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Rosuvastatin Calcium, Sulfonamides/adverse effects/*therapeutic use, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome
¸µÅ©

ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
Incidences of muscle or liver enzyme elevation were similar between the two groups.
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.12.042
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå